26 Jan please use the attached documents for assistance FEEDBACK: I suggest working some more on the research question as it very b
please use the attached documents for assistance
FEEDBACK:
I suggest working some more on the research question as it very broad. Also, given the constraints of this project (see the project guidelines), you cannot answer this question.
Running head: Topic Selection, Search Terms, and Preliminary Research Question 1
Employee performance is one of the most important factors to a company’s success. Motivational mechanisms improve productivity which leads to higher success in the workplace. No matter the reason, it shows in the employee’s work ethic. On the contrary, if an employee is not motivated, they will display poor performance, hurting its brand. Relational mechanisms are mechanisms that initiate and enhance social interactions in performance measurement. This includes personal contacts, information sharing, mutual support, and teamwork (Juhani et al., 2020). In other words, when employees have everyday social interactions and trust amongst one another, they are more than likely to perform well as a team. Thus, increasing a positive work environment and more employee engagement. I am currently employed with a company I have long desired to work with. I work every day for eight hours, and sometimes longer when needed. I love what I do and what rewards it brings. This is my motivation. However, I work remotely, and most of the time, I am home. I do not particularly care for this because I long for social interaction. I want to investigate further the relationship between motivation mechanism and social interaction and its impact on employees’ work performance.
Preliminary Research Question
How does the relationship between motivation mechanisms and social interaction influence an employees’ work performance?
Search Terms
· Motivational mechanisms
· Relational mechanisms
· Social relationships
· Employee performance
Reference
Juhani Ukko, Minna Saunila & Tero Rantala (2020) Connecting relational mechanisms to performance measurement in a digital service supply chain, Production Planning & Control, 31:2-3, 233-244, DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1631466
,
PSY 510 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Research Question, Hypothesis, and Annotated Bibliography
This assignment is another building block for the final project.
Prompt: In Module Four, you will submit the following in a paper:
A testable research question based on previous research related to your chosen topic and a description of your research question’s relevance to the field of psychology. Make sure to address your instructor’s feedback from Milestone One, in which you submitted your preliminary research question.
A testable hypothesis based on the research question Abstracts for at least six articles that are related to the research question and hypothesis. For the purposes of this assignment, it is acceptable to copy
the abstract from each article and paste it into your paper.
Annotations for at least six articles
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. You need to provide citations, abstracts, and annotations for at least six peer-reviewed articles.
Rubric
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Research Question Creates a testable research question based on previous research related to the chosen topic and describes its relevance to the field of psychology
Creates a testable research question based on previous research related to the chosen topic, but does not describe its relevance to the field of psychology
Creates a testable research question and provides a description, but question is not based on the previous research around the topic
Does not create a testable research question and/or does not submit description of the question
10
Hypothesis Creates a testable hypothesis based on the research question and research around the topic
Creates a hypothesis based on the research question and research around the topic, but hypothesis is not testable, or explanation has gaps in detail or accuracy
Does not create a hypothesis based on the research question and research around the topic
10
Article Selection/Abstract
Includes the abstracts of at least six articles that are related to the research question and hypothesis
Includes the abstracts of at least six articles, but some may not be related to the research question and hypothesis
Does not provide the abstracts of at least six articles
10
Annotations: Evaluation of the
Article
Evaluates articles and describes how each relates to the research question and hypothesis
Evaluates articles, but connections to the research question and hypothesis lack clarity and detail
Evaluates articles, but does not draw connections to the research question and hypothesis
Does not evaluate articles 25
Annotations: Comparison to Other
Sources
Analyzes how the articles contradict or complement other sources used in the bibliography and provides concrete examples
Analyzes how the articles contradict or complement other sources used in the bibliography
Analyzes how the articles contradict or complement other sources, but analysis includes some errors
Does not analyze how the articles contradict or complement other sources used in the bibliography
20
Annotations: Limitations
Addresses limitations of the articles and explains why these limitations matter
Addresses limitations of the articles, but does not explain why the limitations matter
Addresses limitations of the articles, but analysis includes some errors
Does not address limitations of the articles
20
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has some major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
5
Total 100%
