01 Apr Demonstrate ability to develop a treatment plan for a case using structural family theory
Order Instructions
Assignment 4d: Milestone 3
Objective: Demonstrate ability to develop a treatment plan for a case using structural family theory.
In this assignment, you will develop a treatment plan. Treatment planning enables you to have a roadmap for your work with a family. A roadmap is imperative when faced with the challenges families bring to therapy. As the counselor, you are the one holding the map that leads the family towards their goals.
Read Chapter 7 in your textbook by Gehart.
Develop a treatment plan using Structural Family Theory for the family you choose to complete Milestone 1 and the case conceptualization that you wrote in Milestone 2.
The family that was chosen was Abraham and Sarah out of the Bible
The Bible entails that Abraham was experiencing the joy and pain of living in faith. Sarah conceived Isaac to fulfill God’s promise (Sonek, 2019). However, the birth of Isaac served as a threat for Ishmael, Abraham’s and Hagar’s son, for a significant period, was perceived as an heir and a hope for his father’s dreams. However, he is set aside in favor of Isaac, the newcomer. The tension in Abraham’s family begins to progress and climaxes when Ishmael Isaac and Sarah pronounce an ultimatum. This ultimatum was dictating Abraham to kick off Hagar and her son Ishmael. This ultimatum tends to plunge Abraham from the joyful heights to the depths of severe grief for the love of his son. Abraham was facing the most difficult decision in life. For instance, he was concerned with the dilemma of whether to make his wife face life’s reality and learn to live with Hagar and Ishmael or consent to Sarah’s request that was founded on jealousy and send Ishmael and his mother away.
Address the following points in your treatment plan:
Phase specific tasks
Phase specific goals
Diversity Considerations
The paper should be in APA style: cover page, double spaced, the first line indented, and citations and reference list if needed.
Rubric
50-Pt Milestone Rubric (2)
50-Pt Milestone Rubric (2)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
30 to >25.0 pts
Full Marks
Content is relevant with concrete examples and sound reasoning. References cited support topic, validate facts, and are well-integrated.
25 to >20.0 pts
Average
Content is relevant, but somewhat lacks concrete examples, sound reasoning, and/or validation through cited resources.
20 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content is relevant, but substantially lacks concrete examples, sound reasoning, and/or validation through cited resources.
0 pts
No submission
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation
13 to >10.0 pts
Full Marks
Paper contains a clear flow of introduction, body, and conclusion. Paper presents clear message with consistent tone and appropriate formatting.
10 to >7.0 pts
Average
Paper has minor errors with flow between components or contains minor inconsistencies with message or tone.
7 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Paper lacks clear flow between components or needs clearer language and/or formatting consistency.
0 pts
No Submission
13 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
7 to >5.0 pts
Full Marks
Writing contains very few grammatical errors, and citations are correctly formatted using APA style.
5 to >3.0 pts
Average
Writing contains some grammatical errors that do not detract from paper, and/or resources are cited based on APA style.
3 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Writing contains some grammatical errors that detract from paper, and/or resources are incorrectly cited.
0 pts
No Submission
7 pts
Total Points: 50
