Quality Improvement Final Project (Medical Errors).

12 Aug Quality Improvement Final Project (Medical Errors).

Posted at 10:38h in medicine by

Clinical Assignment: Quality Improvement Final Project (Medical Errors).

This is the final project (Putting it all together for the final Quality Improvement Project). You will find attached the 3 Parts previously completed by you.

Goal:

To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of the Quality Improvement Project.
Evaluate the clinical project.
Putting it all together for the final Quality Improvement Project.

Content Requirements:

A description of the clinical issue to be addressed in the project.
A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis for the project. Analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the quality improvement process.
An outline of the action plan for the project.
An assessment of clinical issue that is the focus of the quality improvement project.
Discuss stakeholders and decision makers who need to be involved in the quality improvement project.
Discuss resources including budget, personnel and time needed for the quality improvement project.
Discuss potential strategies for implementation and evaluation.

Submission Instructions:

The paper is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
The final project is to be 8 – 12 pages in length and formatted per current APA, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
Incorporate a minimum of 9 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.

null

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Final Essay/Paper Rubric
Criteria	Ratings				Points
Identification of Main Issues/Problems	Distinguished – 10 points Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.	Excellent – 8 points Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.	Fair – 6 points Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.	Poor – 4 points Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.	10 points
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems	Distinguished – 10 points Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.	Excellent – 8 points Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.	Fair – 6 points Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.	Poor – 4 points Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.	10 points
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding	Distinguished – 10 points Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.	Excellent – 8 points Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.	Fair – 6 points Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.	Poor – 4 points Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.	10 points
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature	Distinguished – 10 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.	Excellent – 8 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.	Fair – 6 points Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.	Poor – 4 points Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.	10 points
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines	Distinguished – 10 points Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.	Excellent – 8 points Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.	Fair – 6 points Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.	Poor – 4 points Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

12 Aug Quality Improvement Final Project (Medical Errors).

Related Tags

Who We Are

Some Categories

More Links

We Accept