28 Sep Overview: In this milestone, you will submit your recommendations for technology for the institution and how it will be implemented.? Specifically the following critical elements m
Overview: In this milestone, you will submit your recommendations for technology for the institution and how it will be implemented.
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
III. Technology System Recommendations: In this final section of your final project, you will review the provided technology options and make informed recommendations to the organization regarding which technology it should choose.
A. Determine the needs of the various roles of the organization in a new technology.
B. Recommend a new health information technology system that meets the following criteria. Be sure to justify how your recommendations meet the criteria. The new health technology must:
1. Abide by provided health regulations and laws
2. Align with the needs of all staff members of the previously described organization
3. Ensure the ethical management and use of health information
C. Determine how the organization could more effectively invest its financial resources into the recommended technology system. Be sure to justify your response.
D. Determine how the organization could monitor the use of the new health information system. Be sure to justify your response.
E. Determine how the organization could effectively invest its time into the implementation of the new health information technology system. Be sure to justify your response.
Guidelines for Submission: This milestone must be 2–3 pages in length (plus a cover page and references) and must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. All references cited in APA format.
Below is the:
rubric(follow verbatim)
Provided technology sheet
HIM 500 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In this milestone, you will submit your recommendations for technology for the institution and how it will be implemented.
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
III. Technology System Recommendations: In this final section of your final project, you will review the provided technology options and make informed recommendations to the organization regarding which technology it should choose.
A. Determine the needs of the various roles of the organization in a new technology. B. Recommend a new health information technology system that meets the following criteria. Be sure to justify how your recommendations meet
the criteria. The new health technology must: 1. Abide by provided health regulations and laws 2. Align with the needs of all staff members of the previously described organization 3. Ensure the ethical management and use of health information
C. Determine how the organization could more effectively invest its financial resources into the recommended technology system. Be sure to justify your response.
D. Determine how the organization could monitor the use of the new health information system. Be sure to justify your response. E. Determine how the organization could effectively invest its time into the implementation of the new health information technology system. Be
sure to justify your response.
Guidelines for Submission: This milestone must be 2–3 pages in length (plus a cover page and references) and must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. All references cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Technology System Recommendations: Needs
Determines the needs of the various roles of the organization in a new technology
Determines the needs of the various roles of the organization in a new technology, but determination is cursory
Does not determine the needs of the various roles of the organization in a new technology
18
Technology System Recommendations:
Regulations and Laws
Recommends a new health information technology that abides by the provided health regulations and laws, justifying response
Recommends new health information technology that abides by health regulations and laws, but recommendations are cursory or not justified
Does not recommend and justify new health information technology that abides by health regulations and laws that the institution is currently not in compliance with
18
Technology System Recommendations: Staff
Recommends a new health information technology that aligns with the needs of all staff members of the organization, justifying response
Recommends a new health information technology that aligns with the needs of all staff members of the organization, but recommendations are cursory or not justified
Does not recommend and justify a new health information technology that aligns with the needs of all staff members of the organization
18
Technology System Recommendations: Ethical
Recommends a new health information technology that ensures ethical management and use of health information, justifying response
Recommends a new health information technology that ensures ethical management and use of health information, but recommendations are cursory or not justified
Does not recommend and justify a new health information technology that ensures ethical management and use of health information
18
Technology System Recommendations: Financial Resources
Determines how the organization could more effectively invest financial resources into the recommended technology system, justifying response
Determines how the organization could more effectively invest financial resources into the recommended technology system, but determination is cursory, illogical, or not justified
Does not determine how the organization could more effectively invest financial resources into the recommended technology system
18
Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Total 100%
- HIM 500 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
Accessibility Report
- Filename:
- HIM 500 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric.pdf
- Report created by:
- Organization:
[Enter personal and organization information through the Preferences > Identity dialog.]
Summary
The checker found no problems in this document.
- Needs manual check: 2
- Passed manually: 0
- Failed manually: 0
- Skipped: 1
- Passed: 29
- Failed: 0
Detailed Report
Document |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility permission flag | Passed | Accessibility permission flag must be set |
| Image-only PDF | Passed | Document is not image-only PDF |
| Tagged PDF | Passed | Document is tagged PDF |
| Logical Reading Order | Needs manual check | Document structure provides a logical reading order |
| Primary language | Passed | Text language is specified |
| Title | Passed | Document title is showing in title bar |
| Bookmarks | Passed | Bookmarks are present in large documents |
| Color contrast | Needs manual check | Document has appropriate color contrast |
Page Content |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| Tagged content | Passed | All page content is tagged |
| Tagged annotations | Passed | All annotations are tagged |
| Tab order | Passed | Tab order is consistent with structure order |
| Character encoding | Passed | Reliable character encoding is provided |
| Tagged multimedia | Passed | All multimedia objects are tagged |
| Screen flicker | Passed | Page will not cause screen flicker |
| Scripts | Passed | No inaccessible scripts |
| Timed responses | Passed | Page does not require timed responses |
| Navigation links | Passed | Navigation links are not repetitive |
Forms |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| Tagged form fields | Passed | All form fields are tagged |
| Field descriptions | Passed | All form fields have description |
Alternate Text |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| Figures alternate text | Passed | Figures require alternate text |
| Nested alternate text | Passed | Alternate text that will never be read |
| Associated with content | Passed | Alternate text must be associated with some content |
| Hides annotation | Passed | Alternate text should not hide annotation |
| Other elements alternate text | Passed | Other elements that require alternate text |
Tables |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| Rows | Passed | TR must be a child of Table, THead, TBody, or TFoot |
| TH and TD | Passed | TH and TD must be children of TR |
| Headers | Passed | Tables should have headers |
| Regularity | Passed | Tables must contain the same number of columns in each row and rows in each column |
| Summary | Skipped | Tables must have a summary |
Lists |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| List items | Passed | LI must be a child of L |
| Lbl and LBody | Passed | Lbl and LBody must be children of LI |
Headings |
||
| Rule Name | Status | Description |
| Appropriate nesting | Passed | Appropriate nesting |
,
HIM 500 Technology Information
Featherfall Medical Center has an existing admission discharge transfer (ADT)/master patient index
(MPI) system that was developed in-house and implemented over 20 years ago. By now, all of the
original programmers have resigned or retired. The system is cumbersome to manage and update to
meet the current needs of the center. This has also led to the compliance, ethical, and governance
issues previously stated.
An RFP was sent out to two vendors: Intel (SOA Expressway for Healthcare) and Alert (Admission
Discharge and Transfer [ADT]). Key portions of the RFP have been summarized to allow for easy
comparison. The responses to the functional requirements have also been provided for review.
Demonstrations were conducted at the Center, and both systems looked good. The MPI module is
preferred on Intel, and the ADT system is preferred on Alert; however, both systems were received
favorably. The committee went to see both systems in operation and liked them both. References were
checked on both systems. The references for Alert were glowing. All of them said that the system was
good and the people were great to work with because they wanted their new company to succeed and
grow. However, given their small size, they might lack the resources of a larger company. The references
on Intel were excellent as well. The only negative about Intel was that the company is quite large and
was sometimes slow to respond to what the company saw as minor problems. The next release of Alert
is due out in 6 months and of Intel is due out in 8 months. The Committee has used the following tables
to summarize and compare the information that was gathered and is awaiting your recommendation
before final decision is reached.
System Comparison
Topic Intel (SOA Expressway for
Healthcare)
Alert (Admission Discharge and
Transfer [ADT])
Cost of interface $378,000 $238,000
Cost of software $465,000 $325,000
Cost of hardware $375,000 $400,000
Implementation costs $275,000 $175,000
Other costs $110,000 $120,000
Annual maintenance $75,000 $65,000
Training costs $350,000 $264,000
Number systems in use in
hospitals
364 12
Length of time in business 30 years 3 years
Stability of company Good Good
RFP Response from Intel (SOA Expressway for Healthcare)
System Functions Standard Next Release Not Available Custom
Admit patient to ER X
Admit patient to inpatient status X
Admit patient to outpatient status X
Transfer patient from room to room X
Transfer patient from inpatient to
outpatient
X
Transfer patient from outpatient to
inpatient
X
Transfer patient from ER to inpatient
status
X
Discharge patient from ER X
Discharge patient from inpatient status X
Discharge patient from outpatient status X
Notify housekeeping when patient
discharged
X
Notify HIM when patient admitted X
Meets UHDDS requirements X
Meets HIPAA requirements X
Contains required demographics X
Automated verification of insurance X
GUI technology X
User friendly X
Delete patient from system X
Multiple levels of security X
Password protected X
Audit trail X
Biometric capable X
Reads barcodes X
Edit demographics X
Edit insurance X
Allow for 4 insurance providers X
Prints standards reports at specified
periods
X
Ad hoc reporting X
Admission list X
Discharge list X
Transfer list X
Looks for potential duplicate medical
records
X
Quality edits built into system X
SQL/Oracle database X
Runs on Windows 8 X
Enterprise-wide ready X
Merge medical record numbers X
Allows for aliases X
Maintains old medical record numbers X
Maintains former names X
Allows at least 999 patient visits X
Data dictionary X
Three-character service field X
Allows housekeeping to notify admission
that room is ready
X
Online no-bed list X
Sends out announcements to
employees/staff
X
Generates list of patients by physician X
Generates lists of patients by unit X
Calculates census statistics X
Performs medical record number queries X
Performs patient name queries X
Standardizes, secures, and governs access
to master patient records
X
Standardizes, secures, and governs access
to master provider indices
X
Standardizes, secures, and governs access
to document exchanges
X
Services for building interoperable
healthcare networks
X
Authentication and authorization X
Management and monitoring X
Transport Layer Security X
RFP Response from Alert (Admission Discharge and Transfer (ADT))
System Functions Standard Next
Release
Not Available Custom
Admit patient to ER X
Admit patient to inpatient status X
Admit patient to outpatient status X
Transfer patient from room to room X
Transfer patient from inpatient to
outpatient
X
Transfer patient from outpatient to
inpatient
X
Transfer patient from ER to inpatient
status
X
Discharge patient from ER X
Discharge patient from inpatient status X
Discharge patient from outpatient status X
Notify housekeeping when patient
discharged
X
Notify HIM when patient admitted X
Meets UHDDS requirements X
Meets HIPAA requirements X
Contains required demographics X
Automated verification of insurance X
GUI technology X
User friendly X
Delete patient from system X
Multiple levels of security X
Password protected X
Audit trail X
Biometric capable X
Reads barcodes X
Edit demographics X
Edit insurance X
Allow for 4 insurance providers X
Prints standards reports at specified
periods
X
Ad hoc reporting X
Admission list X
Discharge list X
Transfer list X
Looks for potential duplicate medical
records
X
Quality edits built into system X
SQL/Oracle database X
Runs on Windows 8 X
Enterprise-wide ready X
Merge medical record numbers X
Allows for aliases X
Maintains old medical record numbers X
Maintains former names X
Allows at least 999 patient visits X
Data dictionary X
Three-character service field X
Allows housekeeping to notify admission
that room is ready
X
Online no-bed list X
Sends out announcements to
employees/staff
X
Generates list of patients by physician X
Generates lists of patients by unit X
Calculates census statistics X
Performs medical record number queries X
Performs patient name queries X
Standardizes, secures, and governs access
to master patient records
X
Standardizes, secures, and governs access
to master provider indices
