28 Sep Assess the purpose of the rules of evidence related to relevancy, hearsay, and admission of evidence
Order Instructions
CJ508-2: Assess the purpose of the rules of evidence related to relevancy, hearsay, and admission of evidence.
In a 2-page paper, state the objection (or why there is not an objection and thus why the questions are proper) to the following questions asked in a trial.
“What did the defendant say when they put the gun in your face?”
“What did Mary tell you she saw?” (Mary is not a witness or defendant in the case.)
“Doctor, what do the records of your colleague say about how they treated the patient?” (Records have not been admitted in the case.)
“Do you believe what the defendant said to you?”
“Did the defendant tell you that they did this in self-defense?”
Asked by the prosecutor.
Asked by the defense attorney.
“Your Honor, on behalf of the defense, we offer the defendant’s sworn statement to the police.”
“State offers the prior convictions of the defendant for felony driving while intoxicated.”
In a murder trial where the defendant does not testify.
In the punishment phase of a trial.
To impeach and cross-examine a testifying defendant.
NOTE: This assignment will require outside research. Use the textbook and at least two other scholarly resources to support your paper.
Also within the paper use FRE rules and indicate to which rule and why that rule would apply for the questions. also the questions should be rephrased to some extent as it can appear to be plagiarism .
As noted the paper should be 2 pages but can extend it a little would be good like a quarter page.
