01 Oct Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts, from an FNP perspective.
Description
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts, from an FNP perspective. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.Be sure to review your APA errors in your reference list, specifically you have capitalization errors in some words of the titles. Also, be sure you are italicizing titles of online sources.
You are managing the primary healthcare needs of a newborn who was born with Hirschprung’s disease. What will you expect to see at the 1 month well child exam? What information will you obtain from the father who has brought the baby to the appointment? When will you have the baby return to clinic to see you?
You have just finished assessing a 5-year-old girl for complaint of dysuria who presents with a fever of 102, nausea, and right flank pain.
What is your clinical suspicion?
What testing will you order to assess the condition?
What is your plan of care including treatment recommendations and their rationale?
