In this discussion, you will post a rough draft of your historical research paper for review and critique a peer’s research paper. This discussion, worth 100 points, includes both your Rough Draft and Peer Critique. The Rough Draft must include (1) 1000 words, (2) a revised thesis statement, (3) three primary sources from your eText, and (4) at least two secondary sources formatted in Chicago Style to support our thesis. If you revise your thesis statement, please also include your initial thesis statement in the draft for context. Your Rough Draft should also be free of grammatical and spelling errors. The Peer Critique must follow the guidelines provided in the Peer Critique Template.