18 May Provide a review of local community healthcare resources. Include the following aspects in the assignment: Use several resources (phone book, Windshield survey, internet, etc.)
Provide a review of local community healthcare resources.
Include the following aspects in the assignment:
- Use several resources (phone book, Windshield survey, internet, etc.) to create a thorough list of non-hospital healthcare facilities in your community.
- Provide the town/city name, name of the facility, type of the facility, specifics about what services the facility provides.
- Were you surprised at what you found? If so, why?
- Do you think there are sufficient services for your community? Why or why not?
- Did you find an underrepresented area (without mental health, walk-in, low-income/free clinic, women’s health, Planned Parenthood, Senior Citizen Center).
- Why do you think these facilities are not represented in your area?
- Make a simple chart with columns for each required section. Answer the final questions under the chart as Q& A.
- Cite any references. Proper grammar, sentence structure, and spelling are required. Use your own words. Copying and pasting are not allowed.
|
|
Exemplary 18-20 points |
Proficient 16-17 points |
Developing 14-15 points |
Beginning 12-13 points |
Inadequate 0-11 points |
|
Comprehension of Assignment (20% of grade) |
Addressed the question completely and thoroughly. Provided additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. |
Addressed the question(s) completely and thoroughly. |
Addressed the majority of the question(s). |
Addressed minimal portions of the question(s). |
Did not address the question(s). |
|
Application of Course Knowledge and Content (20% of grade) |
Thorough technical application of course knowledge and content in a complete and concise manner. |
Technical application of course knowledge and content is mostly accurate, concise and complete. |
Technical application of course knowledge and content is partially accurate, concise and complete. |
Technical application of course knowledge and content is minimally accurate, concise and complete. |
Technical application of course knowledge and content is inaccurate and incomplete. |
|
Organization of Ideas (20% of grade) |
Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. Includes adequate and appropriate supporting evidence. |
Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within a majority of the assignment. Includes acceptable supporting evidence |
Original ideas are partially developed and presented in a somewhat logical, sequential order. Inadequate supporting evidence. |
Original ideas are not present and/or not presented in a logical, sequential order. Organization is difficult to follow throughout the assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. |
Little to no original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. |
|
Writing Skills (20% of grade) |
Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are flawless, including proficient demonstration of citations and formatting throughout the entire assignment. |
Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are accurate including demonstration of citations and formatting within a majority of the assignment. |
Partial errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) including demonstration of citations and formatting within minimal portions of the assignment. |
Multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation), inaccurate demonstration of citations and formatting. |
Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation). No demonstration of citations or formatting present. |
|
Research Skills (20% of grade) |
Accurate and applicable use of resources relevant to the subject matter that enhance the overall assignment. |
Appropriate use of resources relevant to the subject matter. |
Adequate use of resources, not all resources relevant to the subject matter. |
Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter. |
No evidence of resources apparent.
|
