HSV400 – Ethical and Legal Issues in Human Services Unit 2 Reflection: Values Due Date: Points: 100 Overview: This week we examined the human services professional as a person and professional, and how values have the possibility of impacting the helping relationship. Now it is your turn to reflect on your values and the impact those have on your work as a human services professional. Instructions: In your reflection you will discuss the following:

• Identify 2-3 of your values that mean the most to you and explain what each value means to you.

• Identify 2-3 values that would conflict with your values. In what ways would those conflicts impact the helping relationship?

• What values would you not be able to work with and why?

Requirements:

• This may be written in the first person. • 1 full page and no more than 2 pages. • Include your name at the top of the reflection. • References are not required. However, if you do reference a resource then be

sure to cite those resources and include a reference page. Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.

HSV400–Ethical and Legal Issues in Human Services Unit2Reflection: Values

Evaluation Rubric for Unit 2 Reflection

CRITERIA Deficient Needs Improvement

Proficient Exemplary

0 – 14 points 15– 19 points 20– 24 points 25 points Depth of Reflection

Reflection is superficial, with minimal or unclear explanations of how concepts inform practice.

Offers a basic reflection on each concept; explanations are present but lack depth or insight.

Adequately reflects on ethical and legal concepts with a good explanation of their relevance to practice but could be more detailed.

Provides a profound and insightful reflection on 2-3 ethical and 2-3 legal concepts. Clearly articulates how each concept will inform their practice.

Presentation Design and Clarity

Paper is poorly organized or difficult to follow, significantly hindering the clarity of ideas.

Paper is generally clear but may have some issues with organization or coherence, affecting the flow of ideas.

Paper is clear and coherent with minor issues in flow or organization that do not significantly hinder understanding.

Paper is exceptionally well- written, clear, and coherent. Ideas are logically organized and fluidly presented, making the reflection easy to follow.

Personal Relevance and Application

Lacks personal connection or realistic application of concepts in professional settings.

Mentions personal relevance and application but without clear or convincing details.

Shows a personal connection and plans for application, though these could be more specific or actionable.

Demonstrates a deep personal connection to the concepts discussed, with clear, actionable ways these will be applied in professional practice.

Presentation and Formatting

Does not meet page or formatting requirements; significant errors in citations (if used).

Meets basic page requirement but has formatting errors; citations (if used) have noticeable inaccuracies.

Meets page and formatting requirements with minor errors; citations (if any) are mostly correct.

Paper adheres to the requirement of 1-2 pages, is well formatted, and if applicable, citations are done impeccably.