07 Jul Postcode debriefings; improve both patient outcomes (survival of code blue and time spent in code) and nursing resilience in Emergency Department
Summarize, copare, and contrast published literature; what is currently known about the problem, including relevant previous studeis, then synthesize the key concepts.
Abella BS. The importance of cardiopulmonary resuscitationquality. Curr Opin Crit Care 19: 175-180, 2013.
2. AbrahamLJ, Thom O, Greenslade JH, Wallis M, Johnston AN, Carlstrm E, Mills D, andCrilly J. Morale, stress and coping strategies of staff working in theemergency department: A comparison of two different-sized departments.Emergency Medicine Australasia 30: 375-381, 2018.
3. Berg GM,Hervey AM, Basham-Saif A, Parsons D, Acuna DL, and Lippoldt D. Acceptabilityand implementation of debriefings after trauma resuscitation. J Trauma Nurs 21:201-208, 2014.
4. Berg KM,Cheng A, Panchal AR, Topjian AA, Aziz K, Bhanji F, Bigham BL, Hirsch KG, HooverAV, Kurz MC, Levy A, Lin Y, Magid DJ, Mahgoub M, Peberdy MA, Rodriguez AJ,Sasson C, and Lavonas EJ. Part 7: Systems of Care: 2020 American HeartAssociation Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and EmergencyCardiovascular Care. Circulation 142: S580-s604, 2020.
5. Cantu L,and Thomas L. Baseline well-being, perceptions of critical incidents, andopenness to debriefing in community hospital emergency department clinicalstaff before COVID-19, a cross-sectional study. Bmc Emergency Medicine 20:2020.
6. Cheng A,Nadkarni VM, Mancini MB, Hunt EA, Sinz EH, Merchant RM, Donoghue A, Duff JP,Eppich W, Auerbach M, Bigham BL, Blewer AL, Chan PS, and Bhanji F.Resuscitation Education Science: Educational Strategies to Improve OutcomesFrom Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American HeartAssociation. Circulation 138: e82-e122, 2018.
7. Cooper S,Winton M, and Farrington-Exley J. Fifteen-minute consultation: Time Out as analternative to toxic debrief. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 105: 270-275, 2020.
8. CopelandD, and Liska H. Implementation of a Post-Code Pause: Extending Post-EventDebriefing to Include Silence. J Trauma Nurs 23: 58-64, 2016.
9. CopelandD. Implementation of a Post-Code Pause. Journal of Trauma Nursing 23: 58-64,2016.
10. Coppens I,Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A, and Beeckman D. The effectiveness of crisis resourcemanagement and team debriefing in resuscitation education of nursing students:A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Nursing (John Wiley &Sons, Inc) 27: 77-85, 2018.
11. Couper K,Mason AJ, Gould D, Nolan JP, Soar J, Yeung J, Harrison D, and Perkins GD. Theimpact of resuscitation system factors on in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomesacross UK hospitals: An observational study. Resuscitation 151: 166-172, 2020.
12. Couper K,and Perkins GD. Debriefing after resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 19:188-194, 2013.
13. Crowe C,Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, Dameff C, Stolz U, Silver A, Roosa J, Page R,LoVecchio F, and Spaite DW. Measuring and improving cardiopulmonaryresuscitation quality inside the emergency department. Resuscitation 93: 8-13,2015.
14. CunninghamT, Ducar DM, and Keim-Malpass J. “The Pause”: A Delphi MethodologyExamining an End-of-Life Practice. Western Journal of Nursing Research 41:1481-1498, 2019.
15. DiLibero J,DeSanto-Madeya S, Dottery R, Sullivan L, and O’Donoghue SC. Improving theAccuracy of Delirium Assessments in Neuroscience Patients Scaling a QualityImprovement Program to Improve Nurses’ Skill, Compliance, and Accuracy in theUse of the Confusion Assessment Method in the Intensive Care Unit Tool.Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 37: 26-34, 2018.
16. Dranov V.Implementation of Post Event Debriefing in the Neuroscience Intensive CareUnit. 2021.
17. Edelson DP,Yuen TC, Mancini ME, Davis DP, Hunt EA, Miller JA, and Abella BS. Hospitalcardiac arrest resuscitation practice in the United States: a nationallyrepresentative survey. J Hosp Med 9: 353-357, 2014.
18. Gardner R.Introduction to debriefing. Semin Perinatol 37: 166-174, 2013.
19. GilmartinS, Martin L, Kenny S, Callanan I, and Salter N. Promoting hot debriefing in anemergency department. BMJ Open Qual 9: 2020.
20. Greif R,Bhanji F, Bigham BL, Bray J, Breckwoldt J, Cheng A, Duff JP, Gilfoyle E, HsiehMJ, Iwami T, Lauridsen KG, Lockey AS, Ma MH, Monsieurs KG, Okamoto D,Pellegrino JL, Yeung J, and Finn JC. Education, Implementation, and Teams: 2020International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and EmergencyCardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 142:S222-s283, 2020.
21. Greif R,Bhanji F, Bigham BL, Bray J, Breckwoldt J, Cheng A, Duff JP, Gilfoyle E, HsiehMJ, Iwami T, Lauridsen KG, Lockey AS, Ma MH, Monsieurs KG, Okamoto D,Pellegrino JL, Yeung J, Finn JC, Baldi E, Beck S, Beckers SK, Blewer AL, BoultonA, Cheng-Heng L, Yang CW, Coppola A, Dainty KN, Damjanovic D, Djrv T, DonoghueA, Georgiou M, Gunson I, Krob JL, Kuzovlev A, Ko YC, Leary M, Lin Y, ManciniME, Matsuyama T, Navarro K, Nehme Z, Orkin AM, Pellis T, Pflanzl-Knizacek L,Pisapia L, Saviani M, Sawyer T, Scapigliati A, Schnaubelt S, Scholefield B,Semeraro F, Shammet S, Smyth MA, Ward A, and Zace D. Education, Implementation,and Teams: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation andEmergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitation 156: A188-a239, 2020.
22. Healy S,and Tyrrell M. Stress in emergency departments: experiences of nurses anddoctors. Emerg Nurse 19: 31-37, 2011.
23. Healy S,and Tyrrell M. Importance of debriefing following critical incidents. EmergNurse 20: 32-37, 2013.
24. Hoffman K,and von Sadovszky V. Nurses’ Responses and Reactions to an Emergent PediatricSimulation Exercise. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development 24: 12-19,2018.
25. Hunt EA,Jeffers J, McNamara L, Newton H, Ford K, Bernier M, Tucker EW, Jones K, O’BrienC, Dodge P, Vanderwagen S, Salamone C, Pegram T, Rosen M, Griffis HM, andDuval-Arnould J. Improved Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance With CODEACES(2): A Resuscitation Quality Bundle. J Am Heart Assoc 7: e009860, 2018.
26. Johnston A,Abraham L, Greenslade J, Thom O, Carlstrom E, Wallis M, and Crilly J. Reviewarticle: Staff perception of the emergency department working environment:Integrative review of the literature. Emerg Med Australas 28: 7-26, 2016.
27. Kelly L.Burnout, Compassion Fatigue, and Secondary Trauma in Nurses Recognizing theOccupational Phenomenon and Personal Consequences of Caregiving. Critical CareNursing Quarterly 43: 73-80, 2020.
28. Kessler DO,Peterson DT, Bragg A, Yiqun L, John Z, Duff J, Adler M, Brown L, Bhanji F,Davidson J, Grant D, Cheng A, Lin Y, and Zhong J. Causes for Pauses DuringSimulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 18:e311-e317, 2017.
29. LaurendineAM. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Neonatal Intensive Care Resuscitationwith Debriefing Initiatives. Pediatric Nursing 46: 245-253, 2020.
30. Lemson J,and Haerkens M. Never waste an opportunity to debrief*. Crit Care Med 42:1740-1741, 2014.
31. Malik AO,Nallamothu BK, Trumpower B, Kennedy M, Krein SL, Chinnakondepalli KM, HejjajiV, and Chan PS. Association Between Hospital Debriefing Practices WithAdherence to Resuscitation Process Measures and Outcomes for In-HospitalCardiac Arrest. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 13: e006695, 2020.
32. Morrison W,and Madrigal V. We Still Round the Next Day. Pediatrics 145: 2020.
33. Mullan PC,Cochrane NH, Chamberlain JM, Burd RS, Brown FD, Zinns LE, Crandall KM, andO’Connell KJ. Accuracy of Postresuscitation Team Debriefings in a PediatricEmergency Department. Annals of Emergency Medicine 69: N.PAG-N.PAG, 2017.
34. Nocera M,and Merritt C. Pediatric Critical Event Debriefing in Emergency MedicineTraining: An Opportunity for Educational Improvement. AEM Educ Train 1:208-214, 2017.
35. Nolan JP,Sandroni C, Bttiger BW, Cariou A, Cronberg T, Friberg H, Genbrugge C, HaywoodK, Lilja G, Moulaert VRM, Nikolaou N, Olasveengen TM, Skrifvars MB, Taccone F,and Soar J. European Resuscitation Council and European Society of IntensiveCare Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care. Intensive Care Med 47:369-421, 2021.
36. PrzednowekT, Stacey C, Baird K, Nolan R, Kellar J, and Corser WD. Implementation of aRapid Post-Code Debrief Quality Improvement Project in a Community EmergencyDepartment Setting. Spartan Med Res J 6: 21376, 2021.
37. SchneiderA, Wehler M, and Weigl M. Effects of work conditions on provider mentalwell-being and quality of care: a mixed-methods intervention study in theemergency department. BMC Emergency Medicine 19: 1, 2019.
38. Sjberg F,Schnning E, and Salzmann-Erikson M. Nurses’ experiences of performingcardiopulmonary resuscitation in intensive care units: a qualitative study. JClin Nurs 24: 2522-2528, 2015.
39. Sjberg F,Schnning E, and SalzmannErikson M. Nurses’ experiences of performingcardiopulmonary resuscitation in intensive care units: a qualitative study.Journal of Clinical Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc) 24: 2522-2528, 2015.
40. Soar J,Edelson DP, and Perkins GD. Delivering high-quality cardiopulmonaryresuscitation in-hospital. Curr Opin Crit Care 17: 225-230, 2011.
41. Spencer SA,Nolan JP, Osborn M, and Georgiou A. The presence of psychological traumasymptoms in resuscitation providers and an exploration of debriefing practices.Resuscitation 142: 175-181, 2019.
42. Spencer SA,Nolan JP, Osborn M, and Georgiou A. The presence of psychological traumasymptoms in resuscitation providers and an exploration of debriefing practices.Resuscitation 142: 175-181, 2019.
43. Spencer SA,Nolan JP, Osborn M, and Georgiou A. The presence of psychological traumasymptoms in resuscitation providers and an exploration of debriefing practices.Resuscitation 142: 175-181, 2019.
44. Spitzer CR,Evans K, Buehler J, Ali NA, and Besecker BY. Code blue pit crew model: A novelapproach to in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation 143:158-164, 2019.
45. Tata B,Nuzum D, Murphy K, Karimi L, and Cadge W. Staff-Care by Chaplains duringCOVID-19. Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling 75: 24-29, 2021.
46. Timms V.BET 1: To debrief or not debrief. Emerg Med J 36: 444-445, 2019.
47. Ugwu CV,Medows M, Don-Pedro D, and Chan J. Critical Event Debriefing in a CommunityHospital. Cureus 12: e8822, 2020.
48. Walker CA,McGregor L, Taylor C, and Robinson S. STOP5: a hot debrief model forresuscitation cases in the emergency department. Clin Exp Emerg Med 7: 259-266,2020.
49. Willemse S,Smeets W, van Leeuwen E, Nielen-Rosier T, Janssen L, and Foudraine N. Spiritualcare in the intensive care unit: An integrative literature research. Journal ofCritical Care 57: 55-78, 2020.
50. WolfeHA, Wenger J, Sutton R, Seshadri R, Niles DE, Nadkarni V, Duval-Arnould J, SenAI, and Cheng A. Cold Debriefings after In-hospital Cardiac Arrest in anInternational Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Improvement Collaborative.Pediatr Qual Saf 5: e319, 2020
Gilmartin, S., Martin, L., Kenny, S., Callanan, I.,& Salter, N. (2020). Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department. BMJ Open Quality, 9(3), e000913.
Laurendine, A. M. (2020). Interdisciplinary Perspectives onNeonatal Intensive Care Resuscitationwith Debriefing Initiatives. Pediatric Nursing, 245-253.
Przednowek, T., Stacey, C., Baird, K., Nolan, R.,Kellar, J., & Corser, W. D. (2021). I mplementation of a rapid post-code debrief qualityimprovement project in a community emergencydepartment setting. Spartan Medical Research Journal.
I am looking for a two page double spaced :
A literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. The literature review surveys scholarly articles, books, and other sources relevant to a particular area of research. The review should enumerate, describe, summarize, objectively evaluate and clarify this previous research. It should give a theoretical base for the research and help you (the author) determine the nature of your research. The literature review acknowledges the work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader that your work has been well conceived. It is assumed that by mentioning a previous work in the field of study, that the author has read, evaluated, and assimiliated that work into the work at hand.
A literature review creates a “landscape” for the reader, giving her or him a full understanding of the developments in the field. This landscape informs the reader that the author has indeed assimilated all (or the vast majority of) previous, significant works in the field into her or his research.
“In writing the literature review, the purpose is to convey to the reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. The literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (eg. your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries.()
