I just need you to answer the following questions

1) What was the biggest hurdle when it came to the Annotated Bibliography? 

• How did you overcome that obstacle? 
• What do you feel like you accomplished with the Annotated Bibliography?

2) What did you argue about in your Classical Argument? 

• Why did you choose that topic? 
• Did your perspective about the topic change at all? 
• Why/why not?

3) What is the difference between the Classical Argument and the Rogerian Argument? 

• What was the common ground between both sides? 
• Did the common ground change the way you looked at the overall debate
• Did it have any effect on your solution?

4) What did you take away from the Toulmin Argument? 

• What did categorizing do for you as a student? 
• Do you feel like you examine arguments differently now? 
• Why/Why not?