08 Sep Part 2: Updated Gantt Chart
Part 2: Updated Gantt Chart
Use Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the business requirements document.
Formatting
Note the following:
• The preferred method is for the business requirements portion of your assignment to be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
• Include a cover page containing the assignment title, your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
• Include a source list page. Citations and references must follow SWS format. The source list page is not included in the required page length.
Learning Outcomes
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
• Develop a business requirements document for a project plan.
Rubric Requirements:
1.) Describe the functional business requirements (scope) and scope control.
0 (0.00%)
Did not describe the functional business requirements (scope) and scope control. Points:
13 (13.00%)
Attempted to describe the functional business requirements but did not specify scope control, left out key functional requirements, critical specifications were missing from the business requirements identified, and/or included more than five incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
15 (15.00%)
Described the functional business requirements (scope) and scope control, but left out some functional requirements, some specifications were missing from the business requirements identified, and /or included 3–5 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
17 (17.00%)
Described the functional business requirements (scope) and scope control, but minor specifications were missing from the business requirements identified and/or included 1–2 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
20 (20.00%)
Described the functional business requirements (scope) and scope control.
2.) Describe non-functional business requirements, such as governance, risk, and compliance.
0 (0.00%)
Did not describe non-functional business requirements, such as governance, risk, and compliance. Points:
9.75 (9.75%)
Attempted to describe non-functional business requirements, such as governance, risk, and compliance, but critical non-functional business requirements were missing, key specifications were left out of the identified non-functional business requirements, and/or included more than five incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
11.25 (11.25%)
Described non-functional business requirements, such as governance, risk, and compliance, but some non-functional business requirements were missing, some specifications were left out of the identified non-functional business requirements, and/or included 3–5 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
12.75 (12.75%)
Described non-functional business requirements, such as governance, risk, and compliance, but minor specifications were left out of the identified non-functional business requirements, and/or included 1–2 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
15 (15.00%)
Described non-functional business requirements, such as governance, risk, and compliance.
3.) Described technical requirements to integrate various e-commerce infrastructure components.
0 (0.00%)
Did not describe technical requirements to integrate various e-commerce infrastructure components. Points:
9.75 (9.75%)
Attempted to describe technical requirements to integrate various e-commerce infrastructure components, but critical technical requirements or e-commerce infrastructure components were not addressed, critical technical requirements lacked key specifications, and/or description contained more than five erroneous or unrealistic data points. Points:
11.25 (11.25%)
Described technical requirements to integrate various e-commerce infrastructure components, but some technical requirements or e-commerce infrastructure components were not addressed, some technical requirements lacked helpful specifications for investors, and/or description contained 3–5 erroneous or unrealistic data points. Points:
12.75 (12.75%)
Described technical requirements to integrate various e-commerce infrastructure components, but some technical requirements lacked minor helpful specifications for investors, and/or description contained 1–2 erroneous or unrealistic data points. Points:
15 (15.00%)
Described technical requirements to integrate various e-commerce infrastructure compone
4.) Identify potential risks, constraints, and assumptions.
0 (0.00%)
Did not identify potential risks, constraints, and assumptions. Points:
9.75 (9.75%)
Attempted to identify potential risks constraints, and assumptions, but critical risks, constraints, and assumptions were missing, descriptions of identified risks, constraints and assumptions were missing critical details, and/or narrative contained more than five erroneous or unrealistic data points. Points:
11.25 (11.25%)
Identified potential risks, constraints, and assumptions, but some risks, constraints, and assumptions were missing, descriptions of identified risks, constraints, and assumptions were missing some details, and/or narrative contained 3–5 erroneous or unrealistic data points. Points:
12.75 (12.75%)
Identified potential risks, constraints, and assumptions, but descriptions of identified risks, constraints, and assumptions were missing minor details and/or narrative contained 1–2 erroneous or unrealistic data points. Points:
15 (15.00%)
Identified potential risks, constraints, and assumptions
5.) Use Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the business requirements document.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not use Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the business requirements document. Points:
13 (13.00%)
Attempted to use Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the business requirements document, but more than five major and minor tasks, subtasks, resources, or time related to the project were missing. Points:
15 (15.00%)
Used Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks, identified in the business requirements document, but 3–5 major and minor tasks, subtasks, resources, or time related to the project were missing. Points:
17 (17.00%)
Used Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the business requirements document, but 1–2 minor tasks, subtasks, resources, or time related to the project were missing. Points:
20 (20.00%)
Used Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the business requirements document.
6.) Use three sources to support your writing.
0 (0.00%)
No references provided. Points:
3.25 (3.25%)
Does not meet the required number of references; all references are poor quality choices. Points:
3.75 (3.75%)
Meets the required number of references; some references are poor quality choices. Points:
4.25 (4.25%)
Meets the number of required references; most references are high quality choices. Points:
5 (5.00%)
Meets or exceeds the number of required references; all references are high quality choices.
7.) Clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Serious and persistent errors in clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements (more than eight errors). Points:
6.5 (6.50%)
Persistent errors in clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements (7–8 errors). Points:
7.5 (7.50%)
Partially free of errors in clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements (5–6 errors). Points:
8.5 (8.50%)
Mostly free of errors in clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements (3–4 errors). Points:
10 (10.00%)
Error-free or almost error-free in terms of clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements (0–2 errors).
