18 Jan ? The paper can be written about approaches identified in the assigned readings, a combination of approaches, and/or a differ
The paper can be written about approaches identified in the assigned readings, a combination of approaches, and/or a different approach with use supporting documentation.
Be sure to include a title page, introduction, and conclusion.
|
Adolescent Substance Use Disorders Treatment Approaches Paper |
|
The paper can be written about approaches identified in the assigned readings, a combination of approaches, and/or a different approach with use supporting documentation.
Be sure to include a title page, introduction, and conclusion.
Include at least five scholarly sources in your paper to include the course readings.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
,
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | |||||||
| PCN-535 | PCN-535-O500 | Adolescent Substance Use Disorders Treatment Approaches Paper | 100.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% | |||||||
| Treatment approaches for adolescent substance use disorders | 40.0% | Does not demonstrate an understanding of the assignment directions; does not include a description treatment approaches for adolescent substance use disorders and/or the approaches listed were inappropriate. | Includes limited understanding of the assignment directions. Provides a description of treatment approaches for adolescents with substance use disorders, but the description contains irrelevant or incorrect components. | Provides a relevant, but cursory description of treatment approaches for adolescents with substance use disorders and the treatment approaches selected were appropriate. | Provides a relevant, thorough description of treatment approaches for adolescents with substance use disorders and the treatment approaches selected were appropriate. | Provides a relevant, thorough description of treatment approaches for adolescents with substance use disorders; and provides real-world examples and scholarly references to support information provided. The treatment approaches indicate professional evidence-based practices. | ||
| Rationale regarding why the treatment approaches for substance use disorder were selected. | 30.0% | Does not demonstrate an understanding of the assignment directions; does not include rationale for the treatment approaches selected. | Includes limited understanding of the assignment directions. Provides rationale for the treatment approaches selected: however, the rationale contains irrelevant or incorrect components. | Provides a relevant, but cursory description of the rationale for the treatment approaches selected. | Provides a relevant, thorough description of the rationale for the treatment approaches selected. | Provides a relevant, thorough description of the rationale for the treatment approaches selected; and provides real-world examples and scholarly references to support information provided. | ||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | |||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from the introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
| Format | 10.0% | |||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
