17 Mar Why you are entering the health care field?
Order Instructions
M5: Journal Reflection 4-7
Due No Due Date Points 60 Submitting a file upload
Assignment header
This assignment will be comprised of four Journal Reflections. You will complete the journal entries and submit your answers within this assignment. This assignment should be completed in ONE document, and your answers should be separated by Journal Reflection # headings (4-7). Please contact your instructor using Canvas Messages with any questions you may have.
Journal Reflection #4
4. Why you are entering the health care field? What is your motivation for serving people in this capacity? Where does that motivation come from? (150 words: 10 pts)
Journal Reflection #5
5. Do you think health care is a human right or privilege? (300 words, 10 pts)
Journal Reflection #6
6. Discuss how the three case studies discussed in the module show how a person from an underserved population has limited access to health care. What would you do to help an underserved person access health care on a personal level, professional level, and national level? (500 words, 20 pts)
Journal Reflection #7
7. After watching the video lecture, answer the following question:
Why is patient advocacy important? (500 words: 20 pts)
To complete this assignment, click “Submit your assignment,” and then choose one of the following methods for submitting your work:
1. Drag and drop your file into the submission box, and then select “Submit file.”
2. Select the file you want to upload, and then select “Submit file.”
Please contact your instructor using Canvas Messages with any questions you may have. Your instructor may take several business days to grade all of your work. Please be patient as your instructor works to provide a level of feedback that corresponds to the hard work you put into the assignment.
PL_icon_gray.png
Rubric
M5: Journal Reflection 4-7
M5: Journal Reflection 4-7
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
15 to >12.0 pts
Distinguished
Prompts are addressed correctly, accurately, and appropriately (in sufficient detail)
12 to >9.0 pts
Proficient
Prompts are addressed correctly and accurately; lack of detail present at times
9 to >6.0 pts
Developing
Uneven in the answer accuracy and level of detail
6 to >3.0 pts
Minimal
Significant problems with providing sufficient content and/or answering accurately
3 to >0 pts
Absent
Content is inaccurate or greatly lacking in detail
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence
10 to >8.0 pts
Distinguished
Relevant and important information from the module systematically utilized and integrated; evidence clearly supports points
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Evidence is provided, including support for all major points, although priority is not given to the most important ideas / terms
6 to >4.0 pts
Developing
Uneven in how often the evidence from the module supports statements
4 to >2.0 pts
Minimal
Limited use of evidence from the module for positions, or poor sources selected
2 to >0 pts
Absent
Fails to provide evidence for positions from the module
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10 to >8.0 pts
Distinguished
Highly attuned to appropriate language, level of formality, and appropriate tone of writing Few to no grammar or language problems
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Engaging tone with appropriate level of formality and audience awareness Some minor errors but they do not occur throughout the paper
6 to >4.0 pts
Developing
Uneven tone, level of formality and/or audience awareness; or, minor errors throughout the paper; or, some major APA or writing concerns at times
4 to >2.0 pts
Minimal
Either: inappropriate tone or level of formality, frequent major grammar/language/APA errors throughout the paper
2 to >0 pts
Absent
Lacks awareness of audience, appropriate tone and level of formality; Major errors in conventional use of grammar / language that interfere with paper readability
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation
10 to >8.0 pts
Distinguished
High quality evaluation; thoughts are carefully considered and carefully explained
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Acceptable quality evaluation; thoughts are fairly well-considered and explained
6 to >4.0 pts
Developing
Evaluation is attempted; some articulation of writer’s thoughts but lacking sufficient detail
4 to >2.0 pts
Minimal
Minimal evaluation present; surface level evaluation with minimal detail
2 to >0 pts
Absent
Evaluation is absent
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollows Prompt
15 to >12.0 pts
Distinguished
Fully addresses all questions in the prompt
12 to >9.0 pts
Proficient
Addresses nearly all aspects of the prompt
9 to >6.0 pts
Developing
Unevenly addresses prompt
6 to >3.0 pts
Minimal
Significant problems with addressing prompt
3 to >0 pts
Absent
Prompt is not addressed
15 pts
Total Points: 60
