11 May Select a well-known company with which you have some familiarity (specify the type of industry). Then, select one of the contemporary management t
Select a well-known company with which you have some familiarity (specify the type of industry). Then, select one of the contemporary management techniques listed in Chapter 1 of the Blocher & Hicks text (attached). Using a minimum of four scholarly articles and submit a thread of 500-650 words directly addressing why and how do you feel that the contemporary management technique selected would be a positive force in helping the company achieve its critical success factors? Ensure you cite the textbooks and scholarly articles from professional account and business journals. Use attached grading rubrics
Criteria Ratings Points
Management Technique
4 to >3.0 pts
Advanced
Thread clearly specifies the company, the industry, and the management technique to be analyzed
3 to >2.0 pts
Proficient
Thread clearly specifies the company and industry but not the technique
2 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Company identified but not the industry
0 pts
Not Present
4 pts
Evaluation Appropriateness of Technique
12 to >10.0 pts
Advanced
Technique appropriate for company, description developed and includes adequate details detailed correlation between technique and company
10 to >9.0 pts
Proficient
Technique described but not in a detailed manner. Few details and no correlation
9 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Technique identified but no detail as how it applies to company
0 pts
Not Present
12 pts
Synthesis Positive Force of Technique
12 to >10.0 pts
Advanced
Thread describes how the technique selected will be a positive force for the company and provides appropriate examples. One or two examples provided
10 to >9.0 pts
Proficient
Description of impact of technique to company but incorrect examples
9 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Description of impact of technique to company but no examples
0 pts
Not Present
12 pts
Originality Overall Content
28 to >25.0 pts
Advanced
Thread conforms to the instructions. Content is well developed. Included originality of thought. Paragraph structure and flow is excellent. Analysis of the technique selected is provided. Questions are answered thoroughly and supported using substantial research data
25 to >23.0 pts
Proficient
Thread conforms to the instructions. Content is developed but lacks originality of thought. Too many direct quotations. Paragraph structure and flow is excellent. Analysis of the technique selected is provided. Minimal research sources used
23 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Content is organized based mainly on text little collaborating research data
0 pts
Not Present
28 pts
Discussion: Cost Management, Strategy, Technique Grading Rubric | BUSI601_B02_202230
Criteria Ratings Points
Replies: New Information
10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
Reply introduces new and relevant information to the discussion of management technique
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Introduces new information with little relevance management techniques
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Introduces new information with no relevance to management technique
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Replies: Evaluation Research support and originality
30 to >27.0 pts
Advanced
Synthesis of research data Reply is well supported with the referenced sources and expounds on discussion of technique
27 to >24.0 pts
Proficient
Minimum analysis of researched data Reply minimally referenced with research sources
24 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Researched provided but no analysis of information
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Thread: Grammar, Spelling and APA formatting
13 to >11.0 pts
Advanced
No grammar or spelling errors
11 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
Only one minor error and 1 APA error
10 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Two grammar errors and at least 2 APA errors
0 pts
Not Present
13 pts
Thread: Text and Journal Support
11 to >10.0 pts
Advanced
Thread contains appropriate word count and content supported with text and relevant scholarly research data
10 to >9.0 pts
Proficient
Thread contains appropriate word count and content not supported with text and relevant scholarly research data
9 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Thread had irrelevant scholarly sources and unsubstantiated opinion statements
0 pts
Not Present
11 pts
Replies: Grammar/Spelling and APA formatting
20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
No grammar or spelling errors
17 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
Only one minor error and 1 APA error
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Two grammar errors and at least 2 APA errors
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Discussion: Cost Management, Strategy, Technique Grading Rubric | BUSI601_B02_202230
Criteria Ratings Points
Replies: Text and Journal Support
10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
Thread contains appropriate word count and content supported with text and relevant scholarly research data
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Thread contains appropriate word count and content not supported with text and relevant scholarly research data
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Thread had irrelevant scholarly sources and unsubstantiated opinion statements
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Total Points: 150
Discussion: Cost Management, Strategy, Technique Grading Rubric | BUSI601_B02_202230
