15 May What Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients What are Population health concerns What are The role of technology i
- What Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
- What are Population health concerns
- What are The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
- what is Health policy
Capstone Change Project Evaluation And Dissemination
The capstone project change proposal will be presented to an interprofessional group of leaders. A final summary of the reflective journal entries will allow students to self-reflect on the process of developing an evidence-based change proposal. Students will apply concepts related to self-awareness, synthesis, and integration of new knowledge and skills in their nursing practice.
Objectives:
1. Present the capstone project change proposal to an interprofessional group of leaders.
2. Demonstrate interprofessional collaboration in the dissemination of the capstone project change proposal.
3. Demonstrate achievement of the course objectives in the written completion of the Individual Success Plan (ISP).
4. Integrate self-reflective practice in summarizing the practicum reflective journal entries.
DQ 1
Dissemination of EBP and research, such as presenting results at a conference or writing an article for a journal, is an important part of professional practice. Identify one professional journal and one nursing or health care conference where you might present your project. Discuss why each of your choices is the best option for you to disseminate your new knowledge.
DQ 2
Discuss why EBP is an essential component of the practice of a BSN-prepared RN. Identify two ways in which you will continue to integrate evidence into your practice and encourage it within your work environment. What obstacles could challenge this plan, and what steps will you take to minimize their impact?
Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation
SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT
Review the feedback on the change proposal professional presentation and make required adjustments to the presentation. Present your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Be prepared to answer questions and accept feedback.
After presenting your capstone project change proposal, write a 250-350 word summary of the presentation. Include a description of the changes that were suggested by your preceptor before your presentation and how you incorporated that feedback. Describe how this interprofessional collaboration improved the effectiveness of your presentation. Include a description of the feedback and questions from your audience after your presentation, and how this experience will affect your professional practice in the future.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
Scholarly Activities
SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT
Points
10
Throughout the RN-to-BSN program, students are required to participate in scholarly activities outside of clinical practice or professional practice. Examples of scholarly activities include attending conferences, seminars, journal club, grand rounds, morbidity and mortality meetings, interdisciplinary committees, quality improvement committees, and any other opportunities available at your site, within your community, or nationally.
You are required to post at least one documented scholarly activity by the end of this course. In addition to this submission, you are required to be involved and contribute to interdisciplinary initiatives on a regular basis.
Submit, by way of this assignment, a summary report of the scholarly activity, including who, what, where, when, and any relevant take-home points. Include the appropriate program competencies associated with the scholarly activity as well as future professional goals related to this activity. You may use the "Scholarly Activity Summary" resource to help guide this assignment.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
,
Due Date
May 20, 2022, 11:59 PM
Points
90
Rubric
View Rubric
Assessment Traits
Benchmark
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Students maintained and submitted weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to explore the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout this course. This assignment combines those entries into one course-long reflective journal that integrates leadership and inquiry into current practice as it applies to the Professional Capstone and Practicum course.
This final submission should also outline what students have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced during the process, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and, finally, how the student met the competencies aligned to this course.
The final journal should address a variable combination of the following, while incorporating your specific clinical practice experiences:
1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
RN to BSN
2.3: Understand and value the processes of critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and decision making.
4.1: Utilize patient care technology and information management systems.
4.3: Promote interprofessional collaborative communication with health care teams to provide safe and effective care.
5.3: Provide culturally sensitive care.
5.4: Preserve the integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients.
,
Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Rubric
Collapse All Benchmark – Professional Capstone And Practicum Reflective Journal – RubricCollapse All
New Practice Approaches
7.2 points
Criteria Description
New Practice Approaches
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporate additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
New practice approaches are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
New practice approaches are present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
New practice approaches are present, but they are incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
New practice approaches are not present.
Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Interprofessional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Interprofessional collaboration information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Interprofessional collaboration information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Interprofessional collaboration information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Interprofessional collaboration information is not present.
Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Health care delivery and clinical systems information is not present.
Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is not present.
Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is not present.
Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is not present.
Population Health Concerns
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Population Health Concerns
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Information regarding population health concerns is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Information regarding population health concerns is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Information regarding population health concerns is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Information regarding population health concerns is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information regarding population health concerns is not present.
Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is not present.
Health Policy
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Health Policy
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Health policy information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Health policy information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Health policy information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Health policy information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Health policy information is not present.
Leadership and Economic Models
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Leadership and Economic Models
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Information on leadership and economic models is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Information on leadership and economic models is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Information on leadership and economic models is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information on leadership and economic models is not present.
Health Disparities
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Health Disparities
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Information on health disparities is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Information on health disparities is present Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Information on health disparities is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information on health disparities is not present.
Outline of Overall Personal Discovery
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Outline of Overall Personal Discovery
5. 5: Excellent
7.2 points
Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
6.41 points
Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.69 points
Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is not present.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
3.6 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
3.6 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
3.2 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. 3: Satisfactory
2.84 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
2.7 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
