22 May Reflection is a key element of becoming a lifelong learner. Reflection involves critically assessing your own actions and experiences to determine
Reflection is a key element of becoming a lifelong learner. Reflection involves critically assessing your own actions and experiences to determine what you can learn from the past.
Upon successful completion of this discussion, you will be able to:
- Examine tools for suitability for research.
Instructions
- Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
- Review the instructions for using Video Note in the Getting Started playlist. Then use the Insert Stuff icon in your discussion post to access the Video Note tool.
- Prepare a three-minute video note posting that answers the following questions:
- How could the tools and techniques you learned this week enable you to make better decisions?
- How could you apply them to your doctoral project?
- Submit your video post by the fourth day of the workshop.
- Respond in writing to two of your classmates.
- Each written response should be 100 – 200 words in length and demonstrate a critical analysis of your classmate’s post.
- The responses are due by the end of the workshop.
5/21/22, 8:22 PM Preview Rubric: Application to ADP Discussion (25 points) – 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) – Indiana Wesleyan Univ…
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=165060&rubricId=518395&originTool=quicklinks 1/3
Application to ADP Discussion (25 points) Course: 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B)
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement
Inadequate/Faili ng
Criterion Score
Question No.
1
/ 8
Question No.
2
/ 8
8 points
Demonstrated
clear, insightful
critical thinking
discussing how
the tools and
techniques
learned could
enable better
decisions.
7 points
(6-7 points)
Demonstrated
competent
critical thinking
in discussing
how the tools
and
techniques
learned could
enable better
decisions.
5 points
(4-5 points)
Demonstrated
limited critical
thinking in
discussing how
the tools and
techniques
learned could
enable better
decisions.
3 points
(0-3 points)
Demonstrated
little to no
critical thinking
in discussing
how the tools
and
techniques
learned could
enable better
decisions.
8 points
Demonstrated
clear, insightful
critical thinking
discussing how
to apply the
tools and
techniques
learned to your
ADP.
7 points
(6-7 points)
Demonstrated
competent
critical thinking
in discussing
how to apply
the tools and
techniques
learned to your
ADP.
5 points
(4-5 points)
Demonstrated
limited critical
thinking in
discussing how
to apply the
tools and
techniques
learned to your
ADP.
3 points
(0-3 points)
Demonstrated
little to no
critical thinking
in discussing
how to apply
the tools and
techniques
learned to your
ADP.
5/21/22, 8:22 PM Preview Rubric: Application to ADP Discussion (25 points) – 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) – Indiana Wesleyan Univ…
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=165060&rubricId=518395&originTool=quicklinks 2/3
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement
Inadequate/Faili ng
Criterion Score
Response to
Classmates
/ 66 points
Demonstrated
clear, insightful
critical analysis
of classmates’
postings in
determining
the logic of the
arguments, the
correctness of
the facts, the
reasonableness
of
interpretations
and
consistency
with the
substance and
intent of
references.
5 points
Demonstrated
competent
critical analysis
of classmates’
postings in
determining
the logic of the
arguments, the
correctness of
the facts, the
reasonableness
of
interpretations
and
consistency
with the
substance and
intent of
references.
3 points
Demonstrated
limited critical
analysis of
classmates’
postings in
determining
the logic of the
arguments, the
correctness of
the facts, the
reasonableness
of
interpretations
and
consistency
with the
substance and
intent of
references.
1 point
Demonstrated
little to no
critical analysis
of your
classmates’
postings in
determining
the logic of the
arguments, the
correctness of
the facts, the
reasonableness
of
interpretations
and
consistency
with the
substance and
intent of
references.
5/21/22, 8:22 PM Preview Rubric: Application to ADP Discussion (25 points) – 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) – Indiana Wesleyan Univ…
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=165060&rubricId=518395&originTool=quicklinks 3/3
Total / 25
Overall Score
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement
Inadequate/Faili ng
Criterion Score
Grammar,
Spelling,
Length, and
Citation
/ 33 points
Sentence
structure is
complete with
correct
spelling,
punctuation,
capitalization,
varied diction,
and word
choices.
Assignment
length is
correct with
sources
correctly cited.
2 points
Sentence
structure has
minor errors
(fragments,
run-ons) with
correct
spelling,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and limited
diction and
word choices.
Assignment
length is
correct with
sources
correctly cited.
1 point
Sentence
structure has
several errors
in sentence
fluency with
multiple
fragments/run-
ons; poor
spelling,
punctuation,
and/or word
choice.
Assignment
length is
inappropriate
with several
format and
citation errors.
0 points
Sentence
structure has
serious and
persistent
errors in
sentence
fluency,
sentence
structure,
spelling,
punctuation,
and/or word
choice.
Assignment
length is
inappropriate
with several
format and
citation errors
or sources not
cited.
Excellent 23 points minimum
Competent 21 points minimum
Needs Improvement 18 points minimum
Inadequate/Failing 0 points minimum
