21 Jul MGMT520 Course Project Overview
The cases are assigned based on what group you are in, but each student will treat this as an individual assignment. You must write and submit an individual paper. Your response should be well rounded and analytical and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. For full credit, you need to use the material from the week’s lectures, text, and/or discussions when responding to the questions. Post your case analysis in the corresponding week’s assignment dropbox. The case assignments are posted below in the Case Assignments.
The assignment should consist of a Word Document, 2 pages in length double spaced, 12-point font, 1-inch margins not including the title page and reference page. (Short papers will lose significant points!!). All cases will automatically be submitted to Turnitin. Your paper should follow the case format (below) and include a summary of the relevant facts, the law, judicial opinion, etc.
Research the case using the case citation in the DeVry Library under databases (select – HeinOnline), FindLaw.com, and other legal sources. Research the parties and circumstances of the case itself.
Utilize the case format found in the Case Analysis Module.
Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word document.
The cases are assigned by the group you are in. (For example, if you are in Group 1 you are assigned Case 1)
| Group | Case/Citation |
|---|---|
|
Group 1 |
Young v. Becker & Poliakoff |
|
Court of Appeals of Florida, Fourth District 88 So.3d 1002 (2012) |
|
|
Group 2 |
Coomer v. Kansas City Royals |
|
Supreme Court of Missouri 437 S.W.3d 184 |
|
|
Group 3 |
Venkateswarlu Thota, and North Texas Cardiology Center, v. Margaret Young |
|
366 S.W.3d 678 (2012) |
|
|
Group 4 |
Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc v. Bartlett |
|
United States Supreme Court 133 S. Ct. 2466 (2013) |
|
|
Group 5 |
Williams v. Braum Ice Cream Store, Inc. |
|
Oklahoma Court of Appeals 534 P.2d 700 (1974) |
|
|
Group 6 |
Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. Canarsie Kiddie Shop, Inc. |
|
District Court of the Eastern District of New York 559 F. Supp. 1189 (1983) |
|
|
Group 7 |
Susette Kelo et al., Petitioners, v. City of New London, Connecticut, et al. |
|
Supreme Court of the United States 125 S. Ct. 2655 (2005) |
