Chat with us, powered by LiveChat hile reviewing your partner's draft literature review, please provide comments in their paper (in-line comments) focusing on the following: Gap- evaluates and analyzes flaws in - EssayAbode

hile reviewing your partner’s draft literature review, please provide comments in their paper (in-line comments) focusing on the following: Gap- evaluates and analyzes flaws in

 hile reviewing your partner's draft literature review, please provide comments in their paper (in-line comments) focusing on the following:

  • Gap- evaluates and analyzes flaws in existing research, including clear identification of "gaps" or logical needs for the proposed study.
  • RQ and Hypothesis- expresses the value of proposed research and lists relevant RQ/hypothesis to be investigated. 
  • APA style- uses APA style formatting for in-text citations and references; writing is clear and concise
  • You should provide substantive written feedback about where and how your partner could improve his or her paper in each criterion (your grade will be based on this).  Then upload it here at this link so it is recorded in the course Grade Book.

Give your partner feedback that will help them: Think about comments which demonstrate areas they could improve.–“ I didn’t understand this point…”– “I could somewhat follow the organization but perhaps some more headings would help.”–“Did you mean  ______?”–“Did you think about ______?”–Focus on the gap, RQ, and hypothesisWe are ultimately looking for clarity and precision so if you read and are unsure of what they mean, point that out.  It helps everyone to go back and be more specific!Do not surprise your partner with the content of your peer review. Be sure to discuss your thoughts on his or her work with your partner directly and do so with timeliness, professional courtesy, and scholarship. You may share your review with your partner before you submit it here I have attached a copy of my classmate paper and a copy of a power point to help with this assignment, please make comments within the document.

2

Relationship Between Depression (from heartbreak) and Reaction Time

Jenna Lantrip

September 18th, 2022

Relationship Between Depression (from heartbreak) and Reaction Time

There are many reasons that can cause depression and a cognitive developmental delay, but this review is going to be looking at depression that comes from a relational breakup (heartbreak) and how this effects their reaction time. When an individual undergoes emotional distress that was caused by heartbreak it can lead the individual to negative effects such as, having an increased risk of physical illness and stress-related diseases (Izzati & Takwin, 2018). Young-adults, according to Erikon’s theory are going thought the developmental stage of intimacy versus isolation (Izzati & Tawkin, 2018; Erikson 1968). This proves that young adults are either developing intimate relationships with other individuals or they are being isolated from society. Naturally when an individual is actively pursuing an intimate relationship with another individual and this fails, heartbreak is expected. One should never underestimate the effects that a heartbreak can cause to an individual. Heartbreak can result into emotional distress and even in grief responses (Izzati & Takwin, 2018; Kaczmarek et al., 1990 in Lepore & Greenber, 2002). There can be different levels of heartbreak, an extreme level can cause emotional distress from a heartbreak that can lead a person to horrid scenes, such as psychopathology or even death (Izzati & Takwin, 2018; Field, 2011).

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between depression from heartbreak and the effects of cognitive development, more specifically, reaction time in individuals who range from 14-24 years of age. In addition, the participants gender was also investigated and taken into account when examining the relationship between depression from heartbreak and reaction time. The participants were assessed by using the Beck Depression Inventory Scale (Streiner, 2002), the Everyday Cognitive Instrument (Farias et al., 2008), and a sex assigned at birth questionnaire. Results from this study could be beneficial to mental health professionals and individuals of these ages in understanding why they have a slower or faster reaction time than others.

Background of the Study

When an individual does through a relationship breakup this can cause many different negative experiences to happen. Whenever there is an increase of stress coming from an event, there is an increased risk for developing depression (Verhallen et al., 2019). Conducting research studies on stressful and emotional upsetting events can provide for great insight asa to why there are individual differences when talking about stress-related coping and the link for stress and depression. Previous research has shown that the breakup from a romantic relationship can have such a strong emotional upsetting there can be multiple symptoms that are related to sadness, grief, and depression. There can even be a result of having an increased risk of developing a depressive episode (Verhallen et al., 2019). Women have reported for a higher distress score compared to men in the study. In the study (Stoessel et al., () the participants with a relationships breakup in the following six months and experiencing sadness ended over the breakup ended up having the same symptoms of being clinically depression. For women after the break up after four months, they reported high levels of complicated grief (Verhallen et al., 2019). There was also a different brain pattern that was an increased activity in posterior regions such as the cerebellum and decreased in activity in the anterior regions. This was found in these women when they were ruminating about their breakup and the ex-individual in comparison with thinking about an acquaintance. The study by Verhallen et al. (2019) was conducted to examine if the breakup from a romantic relationship could be used as an experimental money for studying a depression-like state. The results from this study indicated that the effects of experiencing a relationship breakup can be captured with two descriptors: “sudden loss” and “lack of positive affect”. The sudden loss and lack of positive affect are both associated with severity of depression and the symptoms. The researchers proposed that this life-event is a viable experimental model that can help with investigating symptoms of depression in individuals who have not been diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder.

Rationale/GAP

Although previous studies have found that the working memory becomes altered after a romantic relationship break up, no study to date has examined an individual’s reaction time after a romantic relationship breakup. According to Verhallen et al. (2021), acute stress and even chronic stress has the ability to impair an individual’s effect on working memory in healthy individuals. Chronic stress and dysregulation of stress response can be a leading factor for mood disorders, including depression (Bale, 2006). Resulting from Rose and Ebmeier (2006), depressed participants showed a reduced performance on their working memory task than the healthy control group did. The results from the study by Verhallen et al. (2021) concluded that there is less precuneus activation and identified a working memory-related brain network within their heartbreak population that relates to depressive symptom severity. The results from this study suggest that there is a relationship between depression from heartbreak and cognitive functioning. According to Schoofs et al. (2008), there has been a slower reaction time and lower accuracy rates due to social stress in male subjects. There has not been research conduction on the cognitive development in terms of reaction time from depression that resulted from a heartbreak and that is what this study will be focusing on.

Research Questions and Hypotheses

This study’s primary purpose is to explore if depression that is a result from heartbreak is related to having an effect for the individual’s cognitive development, more specifically in their reaction time. The primary research question and hypothesis which guides this study are:

Research Questions

RQ. Is there a relationship between depression (from heartbreak) and reaction time in 14-24-year-olds? 

Hypotheses

H0: There is not a statistically significant relationship between depression (from heartbreak) and reaction time in 14-24-year-old’s.

Ha: There is a statistically significant relationship between depression (from heartbreak) and reaction time in 14-24-year old’s.

Nature of the Study

This quantitative correlational study is aimed at identifying the relationship between depression (from heartbreak) and reaction time in 14-24 year old’s. The Beck Depression Inventory Scale (Streiner, 2002) and the Everyday Cognitive instrument (Farias et al., 2008) will be conducted by using an online format to evaluate the relationship.

Significance of the Study

Having an understanding on how depression from a heartbreak can affect an individual’s reaction time in individuals 14-24 years of age is crucial for developing preventions, interventions, and services to help decrease their chances of cognitive impairment. This study can provide information that can help individuals with their mental health, provide coping skills for depression, and give a better understanding as to why individuals may be struggling with their reaction times. This can also give mental health professionals the knowledge to prepare interventions and have more of an understanding of cognitive development for depressed individuals from having their heart broken. The intention of this study is to add to the literature already available about the effects of depression from heart break. This study will allow individuals to participate in treatment’s since they now are aware.

References

Bale, T. L. (2006). Stress sensitivity and the development of affective disorders.  Horm. Behav. 50, 529–533. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.06.033

Fischer, A. H. & Manstead, A. S. R. (2016). Social Functions of Emotion and Emotion Regulation. In L. Feldman Barrett, M. Lewis, & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.),  Handbook of Emotions, 4th Ed.  (pp. 424-439). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Izzati, S., & Takwin, B. (2018, July). The Effects of Written Emotional Disclosure to Subjective Distress and Mood on Individuals Experiencing Heartbreak. In  Universitas Indonesia International Psychology Symposium for Undergraduate Research (UIPSUR 2017) (pp. 217-223). Atlantis Press.

Rose, E. J., and Ebmeier, K. P. (2006). Pattern of impaired working memory during major depression.  J. Affect. Disord. 90, 149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.11.003

Schoofs, D., Preuß, D., and Wolf, O. T. (2008). Psychosocial stress induces working memory impairments in an N-back paradigm.  Psychoneuroendocrinology 33, 643–653. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.02.004

Streiner, D. L. (2002). Breaking up is hard to do: the heartbreak of dichotomizing continuous data.  The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry47(3), 262-266. Stoessel C, Stiller J, Bleich S, Boensch D, Doerfler A, Garcia M, et al. Differences and similarities on neuronal activities of people being happily and unhappily in love: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuropsychobiology. 2011;64: 52–60. pmid:21606659 

Stoessel C, Stiller J, Bleich S, Boensch D, Doerfler A, Garcia M, et al. Differences and similarities on neuronal activities of people being happily and unhappily in love: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuropsychobiology. 2011;64: 52–60. pmid:21606659 

Verhallen, A. M., Alonso‐Martínez, S., Renken, R. J., Marsman, J. B. C., & Ter Horst, G. J. (2021). Depressive symptom trajectory following romantic relationship breakup and effects of rumination, neuroticism and cognitive control.  Stress and Health.

Verhallen, A. M., Renken, R. J., Marsman, J. B. C., & Ter Horst, G. J. (2019). Romantic relationship breakup: An experimental model to study effects of stress on depression (-like) symptoms.  PloS one14(5), e0217320.

Verhallen, A. M., Renken, R. J., Marsman, J. B. C., & Ter Horst, G. J. (2021). Working memory alterations after a romantic relationship breakup.  Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience15, 657264.

,

WEEK 4

C O G N I T I V E & A F F E C T I V E B A S I S O F

B E H AV I O R

TOPICS

• WEEK FOUR: Expression

• Emotional Intelligence

• Facial Expressions

Chapter 30: Emotional Intelligence.

Article: Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. R. (1991). Invited article: Face, voice, and body in

detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15(2), 125-135.

Article: Leach, A.-M.,Ammar, N., England, D. N., Remigio, L. M., Kleinberg, B., &Verschuere, B. J. (2016). Less is

more? Detecting lies in veiled witnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 40(4), 401-410.

Audio Podcast: Radiolab (n.d.) Deception [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from http://www.radiolab.org. (Note: This

entire episode is one hour. If you want the direct URL it is http://www.radiolab.org/story/91612-deception/ from

Season 4, Episode 2)

ASSIGNMENTS

Assignments

• 1. Discussion (2.5%)

• 2. Peer review of partner’s Draft Project Literature Review

(5%)

PEER REVIEW

• The Week 4 assignment is to read, review and give feedback to your peer partner.

• Everyone has been assigned partners (posted under Gradebook).

• If you haven’t already, please send the same draft you uploaded for Week 3 to your partner via

email. Their email can be accessed through Blackboard.

BLACKBOARD ANNOUNCEMENT/EMAIL In Blackboard, you will be able to see your partner’s name under Gradebook column PARTNER

NAME.

1.After you upload the Week 3 assignment ‘Draft of Manuscript Introduction’ please send the same paper

in an email to your peer partner. You can access email in Blackboard under Email –> Select Users

(select partner name only).

2.After you receive your partner’s paper, you will upload your review of their paper under Week 4

Assignment (Peer Review of Partner’s Draft Manuscript Introduction/Lit Review).

1. You can add comments directly to your peer’s paper using the Review–> New Comment function

in Microsoft Word. Upload the reviewed copy into Week 4 assignment and email reviewed paper

back to partner so they can see your feedback.

3.You and your peer will exchange papers on Week 4 (lit review, gap, and hypothesis), Week 6 (methods,

results, limitations) and Week 8 (final paper). The goal of the peer review process is to provide

constructive criticism and feedback while working toward a polished final project.

PEER REVIEW

• Provide comments in the

text of the paper

• Introduction

• Background

• Rationale (gap)

• Research Questions &

Hypotheses

• Nature of Study

• Significance of Study

Literature Review/Background

 A focus on what has been found so far in previous research (what is

known)

 Synthesis of previous literature

 APA guidelines:

Formal, unbiased scholarly writing

Use of personal pronouns only when discussing your research (and

plural “we” only for multiple authors)

Paraphrasing and citations (avoiding direct quotes)

Silva, M.L. (2013, June 12). Strategies for

synthesis [Video]. Youtube. https://youtu.be/c7HtCHtQ9w0

Gap

 Look for common phrases such as

 While previous studies have….

 Unlike previous research…

 This study will address previous limitations by …

 Gap(s) should be logical and easily identified

Research Question (RQs) and

Hypothesis

 Zoom in on the variables found in the RQ and hypothesis

Are they specific enough to be measurable?

Most hypotheses have 2 variables (IV/DV) or 3 variables (IV, DV, interaction variable)

Do they match in wording?

Are they written to reflect the correct type for measures (grouping/continuous)?

WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT GRADE

• Give your partner feedback that will help them:

– Think about comments which demonstrate areas they could improve.

– “ I didn’t understand this point…”

– “I could somewhat follow the organization but perhaps some more headings would help.”

– “Did you mean ______?”

– “Did you think about ______?”

– Focus on gap, RQ and hypothesis

• We are ultimately looking for clarity and precision so if you read and are unsure of

what they mean, point that out. It helps everyone to go back and be more specific!

SHARE AND UPLOAD

• Be sure to discuss your thoughts on his or her work with your partner

directly and do so with timeliness, professional courtesy, and scholarship.

• Be sure to save a copy of your peer evaluation and upload it Week 4

assignment so it is recorded in the course Grade Book.

Looking ahead to next week….

 Methods

 Participants

Who will be your participants? How would you recruit them?

Materials/Stimuli

What scales/measurements will you use to test your hypothesis?

 Procedure

How will your study be conducted?

 Results

Categorical vs continuous data

 How would you analyze the data to test your hypothesis

 Limitations

What other factors may impact your study?

Measuring Variables

The heart of methods is describing how you will measure your variables

Each variable in your hypothesis must be measured

How?

Scales (each variable should have separate scale)

Use standardized scales found in the literature

Check that the scale you select “matches” your variable as a construct

Experimental or grouping design- description of stimuli/manipulation/grouping

and measurements of DV

RQ: Continuous Variables

 Is there a relationship between the severity of childhood abuse and neglect and veterans’ reintegration difficulties?

Need measures for:

 childhood abuse and neglect severity

 reintegration difficulties

Research Questions Example (Groups or Repeated Designs)

Is there a difference in facial recognition accuracy for

those who have experienced childhood maltreatment

between negatively valenced and neutral faces?

Need measures/stimuli for:

IV- Type of face (negative vs neutral)

DV- Facial recognition accuracy (DV)

Part 1

Choose one concept, research finding, or question that stood out to you in your readings and content assigned for this week. Find

an empirical research article about this that was published in the scientific literature and provide a summary of that article here

answering the following questions. Attach the article to your post, and provide an APA style reference for it at the bottom of your

post.

1. What is the item that stood out to you and why?

2. What did the authors of the study you selected examine in their research? What did they hypothesize and why (rationale)?

3. What methods did they use?

4. What were the most meaningful findings the authors reported?

5. What is one limitation to their study?

6. How do the findings from this study help you better understand the content from this week?

Part 2

Looking forward to methods provide a brief explanation of what you may use for each of the following:

What is your hypothesis?

Who will be your participants (list characteristics of target sample)? How would you recruit them?

What scales/measurements will you use to test your hypothesis? Indicate which scale will measure which variable.

How will your study be conducted (online/in-person)?

,

1

Proposal: Effectiveness of non-pharmacological in Comparison to

Methylphenidate Stimulant Therapy

Barbara Maclure

9/18/2022

2

Effectiveness of non-pharmacological in Comparison to

Methylphenidate Stimulant Therapy

Introduction

Attentive–deficit hyperactivity is a psychological disorder that is well known, affecting

both children and adults. Some of the associated symptoms that are associated with ADHD include

inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, and difficulty in focusing. It is reported that in the United

States, about 8.5% of children are affected by ADHD. In the treatment process, several ways have

been put into place. Despite the treatment, many studies reported that some treatment methods

have side effects. Therefore, knowing the method that least has the side effects is crucial. This

research proposal will play an essential role as it will identify whether non-pharmacological

intervention, behavioral therapy, and stimulant therapy have the same results in children aged 4 to

8.

Background of the study

Dr. George first identified ADHD when he was a pediatrician. He noted that his patients

had uncontrollable impulsive behavior. There was an introduction of the drug Benzedrine, which

was approved as it showed to improve ADHD symptoms in children. In 1950 there was the

introduction of Ritalin drugs which were used in ADHD treatment in both children and

adolescents. (Holland & Higuera (2017). The drug that is used in the treatment of ADHD to date is

Ritalin. Despite the doctors treating patients with ADHD symptoms from the 1930s, there was no

actual definition of ADHD. Still, it was given much attention in 1987 when the American

Psychiatric Association (APA) redefinition of the disorder.

3

By 2020, approximately 7.1 million young children aging between 2-17 years with ADHD

had been diagnosed. (Garbe (2018). Despite the prevalence of the disorder among children and

adolescents, ADHD is also present in adulthood. In most cases, this disorder is noted when the

child gets into the class and starts issues of failing to focus on the classroom. There are different

forms of ADHD which entails hyperactive/impulsive type, inattentive type, or a combination of the

two. There is a criterion that is customarily utilized in the treatment of ADHD. The parents and the

teacher are required to document the children's symptoms for a period of six months. Research

shows that ADHD is more common in males than women. One of the interventions utilized is

stimulant therapy, considered standard treatment for children after reaching an appropriate age.

The stimulus, for example, the medication, is said to have side effects which can be either mild or

severe. Some noticeable side effects include upset stomach, appetite change, heart abnormalities,

tics, and weight loss. Although the treated symbols are 70-80% treated, there can be the utilization

of other alternative therapies that do not require the use of stimulant medication and play an

essential role in minimizing ADHD symptoms.

The current research shows that approximately 9% of young children residing in United

States are affected by ADHD. Using stimulant therapy is the primary treatment method for the

symptoms. The current research also show that pharmacological therapy is an effective method of

treatment of the symptoms. Between 2013 and 2019, there were over 5873 articles written about

ADHD. The term “young children " was added to minimize the research and behavioral therapy

benefits and stimulants' side effects. In addition to this expression, the number of articles was

reduced to 500 and 200, while about fifty articles were related to the behavioral therapy treatment

of children.

4

To identify the gap in the research conducted to date, we shall look at the importance of

behavioral therapy and Methylphenidate treatment.

Use of behavioral Therapy

Before the stimulant therapy initiative in children with ADHD, there was a

recommendation for using behavioral therapy, an idea embraced in American Academy of

Pediatrics (AAP). The main aim of behavioral therapy was to help the kids gain self-control, self-

instruction, problem-solving ability, and modeling. Children with that ADHD has been diagnosed

said to have a high likelihood of developing emotional problems in their life. Behavioral therapy

can help children in their initial stages cope with the symptoms not only in childhood but also in

their adult life. A study by Thyagarajan shows that involving the parent and provider in behavioral

therapy in school-based children is crucial. This becomes important for the parent to be taught the

behavioral therapy technique.

The study that CDC did in 2018 indicated that less than 50 %of the children practicing the

stimulant therapy had initially practiced the behavioral therapy. Of the children aged between 4-5

years, only one out of five was taking the medication to treat ADHD instead of recommending the

use of behavioral therapy. This study also identified variations in the use of behavioral treatment

from State to State. (Thyagarajan (2019) The study showed that all those states that opted to utilize

behavioral therapy as the first line of treatment had decreased the number of children on the

stimulate therapies. Most studies have put a lot of emphasis on combining behavioral therapy and

stimulant medication. A study done in 2019 in 170 elementary schools indicated that combining

both therapies improved results.

Methyl

Related Tags

Academic APA Assignment Business Capstone College Conclusion Course Day Discussion Double Spaced Essay English Finance General Graduate History Information Justify Literature Management Market Masters Math Minimum MLA Nursing Organizational Outline Pages Paper Presentation Questions Questionnaire Reference Response Response School Subject Slides Sources Student Support Times New Roman Title Topics Word Write Writing