11 Oct Should include two paperwork, one supporting and another against the question. Each consisting at least 250 words. Please read the attached documents for question.(Highlighted) Should be
Should include two paperwork, one supporting and another against the question. Each consisting at least 250 words.
Please read the attached documents for question.(Highlighted)
Should be MLA Citation.
Deadline is by Tomorrow 8 P.M.
Electoral College
America uses a system to select the president that is unique in the world. As you know, rather than having a national election on election day, America has 51 separate elections (the fifty states plus the District of Columbia). Candidates for president, therefore, must work to assemble a group of state-by-state victories totaling 270 electoral college votes, as 270 votes is a majority of the total of 538 available electors.
The number of electors allocated to each state is the sum of its number of senators (always 2) plus its number of House members. So, states with small populations and only 1 House member have three electors, while larger states have more electors. California, the most populous state, has 55 electors. We allocate three electors to the District of Columbia.
Under this system, small states have a say in the presidential election disproportionate to their size. The smallest (by population) state, Wyoming, has one elector per 192,920 residents, while Texas has one per 763,050 residents.
Here’s each state’s total number of electors:
|
state |
number of votes |
|
Alabama |
9 |
|
Alaska |
3 |
|
Arizona |
11 |
|
Arkansas |
6 |
|
California |
55 |
|
Colorado |
9 |
|
Connecticut |
7 |
|
Delaware |
3 |
|
Dist. of Columbia |
3 |
|
Florida |
29 |
|
Georgia |
16 |
|
Hawaii |
4 |
|
Idaho |
4 |
|
Illinois |
20 |
|
Indiana |
11 |
|
Iowa |
6 |
|
Kansas |
6 |
|
Kentucky |
8 |
|
Louisiana |
8 |
|
Maine |
4 |
|
Maryland |
10 |
|
Massachusetts |
11 |
|
Michigan |
16 |
|
Minnesota |
10 |
|
Mississippi |
6 |
|
Missouri |
10 |
|
Montana |
3 |
|
Nebraska |
5 |
|
Nevada |
6 |
|
New Hampshire |
4 |
|
New Jersey |
14 |
|
New Mexico |
5 |
|
New York |
29 |
|
North Carolina |
15 |
|
North Dakota |
3 |
|
Ohio |
18 |
|
Oklahoma |
7 |
|
Oregon |
7 |
|
Pennsylvania |
20 |
|
Rhode Island |
4 |
|
South Carolina |
9 |
|
South Dakota |
3 |
|
Tennessee |
11 |
|
Texas |
38 |
|
Utah |
6 |
|
Vermont |
3 |
|
Virginia |
13 |
|
Washington |
12 |
|
West Virginia |
5 |
|
Wisconsin |
10 |
|
Wyoming |
3 |
|
Total |
538 |
Various arguments are made as to the desirability of retaining the Electoral College, as you’ve read. Whatever the arguments, we know that twice in the last 20 years, the winner of the national popular vote went to the loser of the election.
In 2000, Al Gore won the popular vote by 543,895 votes, but lost the election after controversially losing the state of Florida by a margin of just 537 votes.
In 2016, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by about 2.87 million votes, a margin of 2.1%. A swing of just 79,646 votes (0.06% of the total votes cast) combined in three states would have given Clinton the presidency.
In 2020, it was even closer. Though Joe Biden won the popular vote by over 7 million votes, a margin of 4.5%, a swing of just 42,918 votes (0.026 of the total votes cast) combined, again in three states, would likely have caused Biden to lose in the Electoral College.
Does the fact that a candidate can win the popular vote by over 7 million votes and still come within a whisker of losing the election matter when you think about this issue?
What’s your opinion? Given what you’ve read, should we keep the Electoral College? Should we try to achieve a “workaround” like the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact? Should we push to amend the constitution?
