26 Jun Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association.
WEEK 6 ASSISGMENT : POLICY AND ADVOCACY
To Prepare:
• Assume that you are leading a staff development meeting on regulation for nursing practice at your healthcare organization or agency.
• Review the NCSBN and ANA websites to prepare for your presentation.
The Assignment: (8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation)
Develop a 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint Presentation that addresses the following:
• Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association.
• Describe the board for your specific region/area.
o Who is on the board?
o How does one become a member of the board?
• Describe at least one state regulation related to general nurse scope of practice.
o How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?
o How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?
o If a patient is from another culture, how would this regulation impact the nurse’s care/education?
• Describe at least one state regulation related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs).
o How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?
o How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?
• Has there been any change to the regulation within the past 5 years? Explain.
• Include Speaker Notes on Each Slide (except on the title page and reference page)
Submit your Regulation for Nursing Practice Staff Development Meeting Presentation.
RESOURCES
• Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
o Chapter 4, “Government Response: Regulation” (pp. 57–84)
• American Nurses Association. (n.d.). ANA enterpriseLinks to an external site.. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from http://www.nursingworld.org
• Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary careLinks to an external site.. Nursing Outlook, 65(6), 761–765.
• Halm, M. A. (2018). Evaluating the impact of EBP education: Development of a modified Fresno test for acute care nursing Download Evaluating the impact of EBP education: Development of a modified Fresno test for acute care nursing. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(4), 272–280. doi:10.1111/wvn.12291
• National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN)Links to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.ncsbn.org/index.htm
• Neff, D. F., Yoon, S. H., Steiner, R. L., Bumbach, M. D., Everhart, D., & Harman J. S. (2018). The impact of nurse practitioner regulations on population access to careLinks to an external site.. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 379–385.
• Peterson, C., Adams, S. A., & DeMuro, P. R. (2015). mHealth: Don’t forget all the stakeholders in the business caseLinks to an external site.. Medicine 2.0, 4(2), e4.
RUBRUCS
NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProgram DesignIn a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions.· Tell us about a healthcare program within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?· Who is your target population?· What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?· What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design? 45 to >40.0 pts
Excellent
Response provides a clear and complete summary of the healthcare program, including an accurate and detailed description of the costs and projected outcomes of the program. …Response provides a clear and accurate description that fully describes the target population. …Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including specific examples. …Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. …Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions as well as fully explaining impacts to program design. 40 to >35.0 pts
Good
Response provides a summary of the healthcare program, including a description of the costs and project outcomes of the program. …Response provides an accurate description of the target population. …Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including some examples. …Response provides an accurate description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. …Response provides an accurate explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and somewhat explains impacts to program design. 35 to >31.0 pts
Fair
Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague or incomplete or does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program. …Description of the target population is vague or inaccurate. …Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program is vague, inaccurate, or does not include specific examples. …Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague or inaccurate. …Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague or inaccurate. 31 to >0 pts
Poor
Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague and inaccurate, does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program, or is missing. …Description of the target population is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, and specific examples is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. …Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProgram Implementation· What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation?How does this role vary between design and implantation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?· Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why you think this? 40 to >35.0 pts
Excellent
Response provides a clear, accurate, and complete explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. …Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, including specific examples. …Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected. 35 to >31.0 pts
Good
Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. …Response provides an accurate explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs and may include some specific examples. …Response provides and accurate description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected. 31 to >27.0 pts
Fair
Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete. …Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague or inaccurate and/or does not include specific examples. …Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is inaccurate or incomplete. 27 to >0 pts
Poor
Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.Sentences are carefully focused– neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. 3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 2 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is incomplete or missing.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, font, spacing, margins, indentations, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list (if sources are cited). 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext
