25 Aug XYZ restaurant owner wishes to extend his current operation by adding a new webpage to the existing web site to setup an online ordering system for Takeaway Orders.
Case Study:
XYZ restaurant owner wishes to extend his current operation by adding a new webpage to the existing web site to setup an online ordering system for Takeaway Orders. This new page should have a scrolling menu and an online messaging capability to Chat with the customers. He also requires a new PC with fast internet connection to be supplied at the restaurant’s takeaway counter.
The idea is that customers will send their requests via online messaging system (chat window). On duty staff receives the order, communicates with the customer, and confirms the customer’s order and pick-up time. A confirmation email/text message will be sent to the customer and the relevant staff. Afterwards, the order will follow the normal process for takeaway orders.
You are required to prepare a Project Proposal/charter covering the following requirements.
1) Create a table listing at least five Objectives (in business terms) for this project as you would word them in the Project Proposal/Charter.
2) Develop work breakdown structure (WBS) of the case study featuring 3-5 levels and 10-20 boxes.
3) Create a Chart or Table, listing all the major tasks, in sequence, and show all dependencies.
4) Draw a network diagram showing all the tasks and their dependencies (abbreviate their names if necessary). Arrange the tasks to achieve the shortest time to complete the project and determine the number of weeks it will take to complete the project.
5) Calculate the slack or float time for each activity, on the understanding that many tasks can be run in parallel if dependencies permit.
6) Finally, list the task numbers that form the critical path.
Assessments 4 Conditions of Using AI
Please refer to conditions of using AI in your assessment provided in the Academic Integrity Module
in the page titled Generative AI: Guidelines for Students.
https://apic.instructure.com/courses/53/pages/generative-artificial-intelligence-guidelines-for-students?module_item_id=88220
Assessments 4 Marking Criteria and Rubric
The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 15% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.
Assessment 4 (Case Study) Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking Criteria Not Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark)
Satisfactory (50-64% of the criterion mark) Good (65-74% of the criterion mark)
Very Good (75-84% of the criterion mark)
Excellent (85-100% of the criterion mark) Project Proposal/Charter (10 marks)
Inadequate understanding of Project Proposal/Charter
Basic knowledge of Project Proposal/Charter with some mistakes
Good understanding of Project Proposal/Charter
accurate exhibition with minor mistakes
Very good and accurate understanding of Project Proposal/Charter Excellent understanding of Project Proposal/Charter Develop and use Breakdown Structure (10 marks)
Inadequate understanding of developing and using breakdown structure
Unable to describe concepts in own words
Basic knowledge of developing and using breakdown structure
limited depth of basic concepts
Good understanding of developing and using breakdown structure
Exhibits breadth and depth
Very good and accurate understanding of breakdown structure
Exhibits accurate, Detailed breadth and depth
Excellent understanding of breakdown structure
Provide Major Tasks and Dependency Table/Chart 20 marks)
Inadequate understanding of Major Tasks and Dependency Table
Basic understanding of Major Tasks and Dependency Table with some mistakes
Good understanding of Major Tasks and Dependency Table
accurate exhibition with minor mistakes
Very good and accurate understanding of Major Tasks and Dependency Table
Excellent understanding of Major Tasks and Dependency Table
Draw Network Diagram of Tasks (20 marks)
Inadequate understanding of Network Diagram
Basic understanding of Network Diagram with some mistakes
Good understanding of Network Diagram
accurate exhibition with minor mistakes
Very good and accurate understanding of Network Diagram
Excellent understanding of Network Diagram
Calculate the slack or float time for each activity and Depict Critical Path (20 marks)
Inadequate understanding of Critical Path
Basic understanding of Critical Path with some mistakes
Good understanding of Critical Path
accurate exhibition with minor mistakes
Very good and accurate understanding of Critical Path
Excellent understanding of Critical Path
Academic Writing Skills (10 marks) – Free of any grammatical errors; using correct sentence structure; applying an extensive range of vocabulary; – Proper introduction and conclusion.
The writing is poor with no logical flow and has grammatical errors.
Information is limited, unclear and the depth
The writing is satisfactory and exhibits majority of grammatically correct sentences that are
The writing has good structure exhibiting grammatically correct sentences, appropriate punctuation with some
The writing has very good structure exhibiting grammatically correct sentences,
The writing has excellent structure and presentation exhibiting fluent, coherent, and grammatically correct is not adequately developed.
The idea is a simple restatement of the topic.
Demonstration of a limited sense of purpose or theme
Insufficient understanding of the topic. appropriately punctuated with some spelling or typing errors
The writing does not go far enough in expanding key issues/ concepts.
The writing requires further information to clarify main arguments. spellings or typing errors appropriate punctuation with few spellings or typing error
The writing is used to support the main ideas and convince the reader of the argument who is left in no doubt of the purpose. sentences
well punctuated with no minor spelling or typing error
The writing perceives a sense of the wider context of the ides
Report Structure, Presentation, referencing (10 marks) – Consistent formatting with suitable headings and sub- headings – Consistent use of labels, highlights, font weight and underline, Reference list – Appropriate Referencing using HARVARD guidelines
The writing shows insufficient application of Harvard referencing Harvard style
The writing shows no in-text citation
In-text citation does to match with citation under Reference list
Report is not formatted and structured
The writing shows inconsistent application of Harvard referencing style
In-text citation match with the citation under Reference list
Satisfactory Report structure, presentation, and formatting
The writing shows good application of Harvard referencing style with some errors in referencing
Good Report structure, presentation, and formatting to large extent.
The writing shows very good application of Harvard referencing style with few errors in referencing
Very good Report structure, presentation, and formatting
The writing shows excellent application of Harvard referencing style with no error in referencing
Excellent Report structure, presentation, and formatting.
