For this discussion board please review Peter Singer's entry in our textbook "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" (Page 678).  You also may want to review the following video:

Peter Singer's Examined LifeLinks to an external site.

Based on the reading (and video) what does Peter Singer think 'the right thing to do' is?  Do you agree with him?  Why or why not?  If you agree with him explain – in your own words – what following his philosophy could do (as an ethical benefit).  If you disagree with him, provide an alternative solution. What would be better?

 Your initial post should be between 250-300 words