29 Jan Based on the scenario that you chose for your project, explain what change management model you would implement for internal and external stakeholders. What change mana
APA format, in-text citation, references include, 1 page
Needed: Based on the scenario that you chose for your project, explain what change management model you would implement for internal and external stakeholders. What change management theory would you use and how would you apply it through IT implementation? Outline specific change and innovation management strategies given your scenario, using best practices in the private sector ( look for attachment of the topic)
Kelly Nhu Tran
Due Date: 12/23/2024
Week 4 Assignment
The crucial entree hospital in rural Pennsylvania, Bedford Hospital, is at a crossroads as its pact for electronic health information is about to expire. A well-planned HIT solution is essential to navigate this modification successfully. Financial limits, stakeholder prospects, and various dangers are all parts of this multifaceted problem. To promise the community's sustained access to high-quality healthcare, obtaining a scalable HIT system that is in sync with clinical and profitable requirements is essential.
The 25-bed critical entree hospital Bedford Hospital in rural Pennsylvania is dealing with an important technology subject as its contract with Cerner Corporation, which manages electronic health records, expires. After moving from a more important academic health center, they are at a crossroads. A planned reevaluation is necessary due to the upcoming ending, even however the academic center has politely obtainable to withstand their Cerner systems for the next 24 months, casing software and hardware expenditures (Gardner et al., 2019). The main worry is getting an EHR system that can last longer than the 24-month upkeep period while financially possible. A critical entree hospital in a remote area faces sole budgetary limitations. Therefore, their interdisciplinary team, led by the CEO and CFO, must devise a plan that satisfies their administrative and clinical demands. The problem goes beyond only the EHR software; it also involves other essential aspects of technology, such as the IT department, operating expenses, network infrastructure, and other related factors. As I traverse this complicated terrain, the end aim is to develop a technological strategy that can withstand the test of time. their top priorities are maintaining financial stability, conformity with applicable regulations, and trouble-free healthcare operations. Bedford Hospital's technical future is in the hands of those making decisions in the following months. I am committed to discovering creative, long-term solutions that help us fulfill the objective of providing excellent treatment to the local community.
Scope of the HIT Solution to be Required
The Health Information Technology (HIT) solution Bedford Hospital plans to purchase covers a wide range of topics, including the functional and technical aspects vital to effective healthcare delivery. If they want to keep things technological, they need to pick an EHR system that works with what they already have, is compatible with other healthcare systems, and lets them share data easily. The HIT solution must be accessible to keep up with the ever-changing healthcare business.
A full range of competences is included within commercial and clinical functionality. Electronic medicine management, powerful certification tools, simplified order dispensation, and cutting-edge decision upkeep systems are all part of this. To modernize administrative procedures, the HIT solution must consider patient ID, scheduling, admissions, release, and registration (Kraus et al., 2021). The scope also comprises the integration of radiology, pharmacy, and laboratory structures to generate a unified and real healthcare system.
In adding, a critical entree hospital in a rural area has particular requirements, and the selected HIT answer should meet those strains. The objective is to improve information interchange and interoperability while adapting features to fit the single clinical needs of a lesser hospital. From a business viewpoint, assessing the HIT solution's monetary viability is part of the scope, seeing things like licensing charges, maintenance expenses, and possible ROI. To offer high-quality healthcare to the society, Bedford Hospital's procurement of a HIT solution must shelter all the bases, from the multifaceted technological components to the tricky business and clinical characteristics.
As Bedford Hospital reflects and acquisitions a new HIT solution, it is serious to do a complete stakeholder study. The technology must cater to the internal shareholders' specific requirements, comprising clinical workers and senior leadership, to progress business and clinical processes. As prominent executive shareholders, the CEO and CFO place a best on long-term financial feasibility. They are looking for a HIT answer that will work within their monetary limits, offer them with transparent pricing data, and show them how their venture will pay off (Campos et al., 2019). The Chief Information Officer hopes for an accessible system that can lodge future technological developments and smooth integration with the present IT structure.
Clinical functionality, such as solid documentation tools, quick order procedures, and advanced decision support systems, is highly valued by the Chief Medical Officer when improving patient care. To maximize nursing practices, the chief nursing officer needs the ability to administer medications electronically and simplify operations. A health information technology (HIT) solution that simplifies patient identification, admissions, discharge, scheduling, and registration is essential, according to the Director of Operations, who is concerned with administrative efficiency.
Quality of patient care and data security are external priorities for community stakeholders and regulatory organizations. The HIT solution must be compatible with other systems so that data can be easily shared with other healthcare providers and meet regulatory requirements. When choosing an HIT solution, it is crucial to understand and fulfill the different demands of all stakeholders. This will aid meet clinical criteria, guarantee organizational achievement, and gratify the society.
Many dangers exist in the monetary, technological, legal, moral, and operational domains related with applying HIT at Bedford Hospital. There is a possible for loss in the first capital outlay and ongoing operating expenditures of the HIT solution. To address this, it would be wise to undertake a detailed cost-benefit examination that considers likely savings, effectiveness, and ROI in the long run. System amalgamation difficulties, possible application interruptions, and data transfer worries are all examples of technical dangers (World Health Organization, 2021). These technological problems can be reduced using a phased implementation plan with rigorous testing and training procedures.
Potential obligations arise from the essential to comply with healthcare legislation and data protection rules. Critical mitigating methods include emerging strong data security strategies and retaining legal advice to guarantee agreement with regulatory outlines. Privacy and consent are two parts that could give rise to moral dilemmas. Trust may be constructed by open and honest communication that highpoints the aids of the HIT solution and talks privacy worries.
Possible operational dangers comprise staff reluctance to adjust and breaks to healthcare workflows. To diminish the impact of these operational problems, well-designed training programs, active contribution from shareholders, and a solid plan for managing change are essential (World Health Organization, 2021). Interoperability with third-party systems also advances data sharing and decreases the probability of data silos. In assumption, operational, ethical, financial, and technological thoughts are all essential for a detailed risk examination of applying HIT at Bedford Hospital. To assurance a fruitful and seamless integration of HIT into healthcare, justification methods should be modified to each measurement, highlighting complete planning, stakeholder contribution, and agreement with regulatory values.
Campos, P. A., & Reich, M. R. (2019). Political analysis for health policy implementation. Health Systems & Reform, 5(3), 224-235.
Gardner, R. L., Cooper, E., Haskell, J., Harris, D. A., Poplau, S., Kroth, P. J., & Linzer, M. (2019). Physician stress and burnout: the impact of health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(2), 106–114.
Kraus, S., Schiavone, F., Pluzhnikova, A., & Invernizzi, A. C. (2021). Digital transformation in healthcare: Analyzing the current state-of-research. Journal of Business Research, 123, 557-567.
World Health Organization. (2021). Strategic toolkit for assessing risks: a comprehensive toolkit for all-hazards health emergency risk assessment.
Borsa, A., Bejarano, G., Ellen, M., & Bruch, J. D. (2023). Evaluating trends in private equity ownership and impacts on health outcomes, costs, and quality: systematic review. bmj, 382.
Aluthge, C., Jibir, A., & Abdu, M. (2021). Impact of government expenditure on economic growth in Nigeria, 1970-2019. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics, 12(1), 139-174.