01 Aug After reviewing the two readings on ethics linked in the Resources, share how these standards apply to you in your attempt to fund and implement a project on
After reviewing the two readings on ethics linked in the Resources, share how these standards apply to you in your attempt to fund and implement a project on behalf of your clients or agency. Give specific examples and cite both sources as necessary. Include any others you choose to incorporate. Share areas that may be a challenge with which to comply given your unique situation or population served.
350 words
36 SEPTEMBER 2017 | RDHMAG.COM
Perseverance with the details increase the odds of being awarded a grant
BY STACI VIOLANTE, RDH, BSDH, MSDH
cording to the Foundation Center,
a nonprofit organization that main-
tains comprehensive databases on
grant makers and their grants, these
trusts and foundations are “in ex-
cess of 88,000 and disperse in excess
of $40 billion every year.”1
Although grants are the most
prevalent way for nonprofit
organizations to gain capital, there
are many other additional strategies
to increase revenue, including
mailings, e-mail blasts, social media
(e.g., Instagram, Facebook, and
Twitter), events, and workplace
fundraisers.
GRANTS AND
DENTAL HYGIENE
The Wrigley Company Founda-
tion’s community service grants
allow an American Dental Hygien-
ists’ Association (ADHA) member
the opportunity to apply and be
awarded a community grant for
those who are “involved in a specific
community health project that im-
proves the public’s oral health and
provide oral health education on
behalf of programs with these
considerations:
• Demonstrate involvement in
outstanding activities with a
community health program or
project, which includes oral
health enhancement.
Grants are funds or prod-
ucts expended by a grant
maker or funder, often a
government agency, cor-
poration, or foundation,
to a nonprofit organiza-
tion, educational institu-
tion, business, or individ-
ual. Most grants fund
explicit programs or proj-
ects and instruct some
level of conformity.
The grant-writing process in-
volves an applicant submitting a
proposal to a funder, either through
the applicant’s own action or in
response to a request for proposal
(RFP) from the funder. The funder
usually wants to know about the
scope of the project, the support
from the community, long- and
short-range impact, and overall
budget and project cost
estimates.
In the United States, grants pre-
dominantly derive from a wide
range of government, public, and
private foundations and trusts. Ac-
The grant-writing process is long, detailed, and can be extremely daunting. It is an extension of the academic environment that competes for the highest level of recognition and achievement.
1709rdh_36 36 8/28/17 4:45 PM
continued on pg. 88
STEP 1 : Establish a relationship with the funder. Building
a relationship with a funder is a great way to establish compatibility
with the grant seeker and the funder before a proposal is even
written. Once this is confirmed via e-mail inquiry, meeting, or
phone conversation stating the program plan, communication is
continuous throughout the process.
STEP 2 : Begin the grant process.5 First, identify a community
and an unmet need and scope to be addressed. Determine if needs
within the community are being met by other organizations. Then,
develop a clear plan that meets all the needs, goals, and objectives;
such a plan can greatly aid in the development of a proposal. Develop
project cost estimates and determine funding for initial start-up
and continuing operations. Match the budget with the goals and
objectives, and know your budgetary limitations.
Research funders to submit the grant proposal to, and begin to
build a relationship with them. Write a specific, clear proposal
tailored to each potential funder that supports activities consistent
with the mission of the grant agency.
STEP 3 : Write the proposal. The proposal should include a
cover letter; a summary of proposal; a statement of need (i.e., the
main focus or problem to be addressed); organizational background;
goals and objectives; a description of program and services that will
achieve the goal and objectives for the organization; an evaluation
that assesses the program; strategies for additional funding after the
grant’s term is up; and a program budget with a timeline.1
38 SEPTEMBER 2017 | RDHMAG.COM
EXPLORING THE GRANT-WRITING PROCESS
writing process is long, detailed, and can be
extremely daunting. It is an extension of the
academic environment that competes for the
highest level of recognition and achievement.
With perseverance, the grant-writing process
will become more familiar, and the task will seem
far less daunting. All efforts put forth will be
worthwhile when one receives an award that will
address an important or crucial demand in a
community or underserved population. RDH
long as six months from the time a grant proposal
is submitted to the time an organization learns
whether it has been funded. Then, if an organi-
zation is awarded a grant, it might take up to
another few weeks before funding is received.
A well-written, detailed proposal, leaving
nothing to chance and specifically following the
grant’s guidelines precisely, will grab the attention
of the funder. The more detailed, the better the
chances of being awarded the grant. The grant-
• Illustrate that oral health education is
one element of the project.
• Show that these activities enhance the
public view of the professional role dental
hygienists play in health improvement.”2
Recipients will receive an award of $2,500-
5,000 per grantee.
The Research Grant Program supports ad-
vancements in the dental hygiene profession
through professional education and develop-
ment, qualitative and quantitative research,
health services research, health promotion
and disease prevention, clinical dental hygiene
care, and occupational and health safety.2
Community service grants—Oral health
community service grants provide low- or no-
cost oral hygiene care and education to under-
served and at-risk populations. These service
grants are designed to legitimize dental hygien-
ists to improve the oral health of these under-
served populations and communities, imple-
ment community health projects, and respond
to their oral health needs and concerns.
Foundation grants—Foundation grants
are the most fundamental and paramount
source of funding to all nonprofit organizations.
Compared to other sources of revenue, foun-
dation grants are the most economical and
produce the most accolades, yet they do bring
forth some expenses, including consulting time
and research, budgeting, program planning,
and staff expenses.3
To begin the process of attaining a grant
for an organization, there are many compo-
nents that need to be considered first.4
• Research and find a nonprofit organiza-
tion. This can be accomplished via the
organization’s website, calling to speak
with staff or leaders, or both.
• Does the organization have long-standing
goals, a mission and a purpose?
• Does the organization have concrete
financial measures?
• Does the organization have the funda-
mental staff and leadership to convey its
declared goals and objectives?
• Is the organization prepared to track,
provide reports, train staff, evaluate the
program, disperse funds as affirmed,
communicate with funders, and meet all
grant expectations and requirements?
If a foundation meets all of these stipulations,
then the applicant can begin the grant process.
Keep in mind that some grant cycles take as
1709rdh_38 38 8/28/17 4:45 PM
88 SEPTEMBER 2017 | RDHMAG.COM
KAREN DAVIS
continued from pg. 31
that can significantly increase value and treat-
ment acceptance.
I’ve never met any dentist or dental hygien-
ist who strives to be less than comprehensive
in their ongoing care of patients, but I have
observed many dental practices that do not
routinely perform comprehensive assessments
or evaluations on patients who have been in
the practice for decades or more. As patients’
needs and desires change, so should their
evaluations to assess esthetic desires, TMJ
dysfunction, occlusal disease, obstructive sleep
apnea, gingival recession, restorative needs,
periodontal health, the need for dietary coun-
seling or tobacco cessation support, and so on.
It is unrealistic within the context of the
periodic evaluation to pay adequate attention
to a host of dental and health issues, but the
return to comprehensive reevaluation is an
untapped resource in most dental practices
that you can begin tapping into right away to
accomplish exactly that! RDH
EXPLORING THE GRANT-WRITING PROCESS continued from pg. 38
Staci Violante, RDH, BSDH, MSDH, graduated
from the New York University College of
Dentistry Dental Hygiene Program in 1997. She
went on to complete her master’s degree at the
Fones School of Dental Hygiene at the University
of Bridgeport. She has been a practicing clinical
dental hygienist for the past 20 years, as well as
serving as clinical professor in the dental
hygiene department at New York University
College of Dentistry. She is currently pursuing
her doctorate of health science in education.
REFERENCES
1. Foundation Center. Retrieved from: http://foundation-
center.org/about-us/mission-vision-values.
2. Wrigley Company Foundation Community Service
Grants. ADHA website. http://www.adha.org/ioh-
wrigley-application.
3. Forum of Regional Associations of Grant Makers.
Retrieved from: https://www.unitedphilforum.org/
philanthropy-education.
4. Sinclair C. Grant writing tips for nonprofits—how to
get your grant accepted. http://www.nonprofitkinect.
org/article/3307-grant-writing-tips-for-nonprofits. Pub-
lished March 5, 2013.
5. O’Neal-McElrath T. Winning Grants Step by Step:
The Complete Workbook for Planning, Developing and
Writing Successful Proposals. 4th ed. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass; 2013.
How to be successful in submitting a grant application
• Be unique: Begin with fresh ideas. This is a great opportunity
to articulate your ideas and thoughts to make an impact.
• Present background and preliminary data: Persuade reviewers that
the work proposed needs to be fulfilled—and you’re the best candidate
to do it. Various grant programs require differing measures of preliminary
data justifying the work before the grant is awarded. To a reviewer, alluring
results relate directly to the specific goals and objectives of your proposal,
and demonstrate your expertise.
• Provide research and design: This section constitutes the major portion
of the grant proposal. The purpose of this section is to depict the proposed
project in detail, indicating to the reviewers’ efficiency in fulfilling the project.
This affirms to the reviewers that the applicants are considerate in anticipat-
ing difficulty and limitations associated with the project.
• Acquire the applicable funding mechanism (e.g., research, equip-
ment): Most organizations assist in finding the appropriate funding
programs and opportunities to suit your grant.
• Follow the guidelines for grant submission: Grants that do not
comply with the particular guidelines can irritate reviewers and leave an
unfavorable impression no matter how exemplary the applicant may be.
• Be clear and concise: Be forthright with respect to your goals and
objectives—keep them short and sweet. Grant seekers are frequently too
enthusiastic in their proposals. Don’t make this misstep: be realistic.
• Summarize well: Oftentimes, reviewers can miss key points. It is best to
summarize and format wisely so key points won’t go unnoticed. In each
section, restate key points from the previous summary if applicable.
• Choose your timing well: Be mindful and realistic of deadlines. Give
yourself the appropriate amount of time to review, reread, get feedback
from peers, and revise a completed draft. Be explicit about the duration
of the project (e.g., 12 or 18 months). Feedback can be extremely valu-
able.
• Delegate management wisely: Be specific about who will do what jobs
and who will have what responsibilities and obligations.
• Proofread your documents: It is imperative to proofread the grant
proposal multiple times, for content, grammar, and punctuation. Have
colleagues, peers, and friends read and comment. Print the completed
proposal and make notes of any changes that may be needed. Head-
ings should be on the same page as their paragraphs; figures and charts
should be numbered correctly and appropriately inserted into the text.
Once it has been proofread over and over, you are ready to submit your
grant proposal.
1709rdh_88 88 8/28/17 5:17 PM
Copyright of RDH is the property of PennWell Corporation and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.