PREP TASKS

(1) READ: This assignment is not a working final document assignment; however, it will eventually make its way to the working final document–just not yet.

For this submission, you will need to create a new WORD document and you are expected to demonstrate the following compounded skills from previous weeks, in addition to the new skills learned this week and through the later Prep Tasks below:

· APA 7 Basics: double-spaced, before and after set to zero; 1 inch margins all around; Times New Roman, 12 pt font; page numbers, upper right in header

· Page 1 = APA 7 Title Page: your title can be something along the lines of, "Objective Summary of Prevalence Research Article" — of course, it will be worded to be relevant to YOUR relevant research variable

· Page 2 = Your objective summary written as an academic paragraph (indented and full sentences) and color-coded with the designated colored font for each component. Use your EXCEL Research Tracker to help you summarize one of your research articles in your own words:

hint: copy this color chart into your Word document where you will write these, so you remember!

WHO = Dark BLUE

WHY = PURPLE

WHEN = RED

WHERE = GREEN

HOW + Process = ORANGE

WHAT = Lighter BLUE

· Page 3 = Your APA 7 References Page (with only the research article you summarized)

(2) REVIEW: Open the following student sample document. Be sure yours looks similar prior to proceeding.

(2) REVIEW – c Student Sample Obj. Summ. (2024-2025).docx

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT TASKS

(1) PLAGIARISM CHECKERS: Review the following document to learn how to meet the newly implemented submission requirements that will be expected for each written assignment in the remaining weeks:

1.

Top of Form

(2) CHECK YOUR SIMILARITY:

· Submit your assignment into the CHECK YOUR SIMILARITY HERE folder

· Evaluate EVERY highlighted text EXCEPT the References Page and in-text citations to ensure it links only back to  your own work.

(3) TAKE YOUR AI TEXT DETECTOR SCREENSHOT:

Racial Disparities in Healthcare Among Pregnant Women in the United States

Tamifer Lewis

Department of Public Health, Monroe College, King Graduate School

KG604-144: Graduate Research and Critical Analysis

Dr. Manya Bouteneff

December 4, 2022

Color coding: who, when, where, why, how methodology & how process, what

Darling et al. (2021) conducted a study between 2001 and 2018 in the United States, France, Spain, and the Netherlands to examine the efficiency of qualified interventions in preterm birth, small for gestational age, low birth weight, neonatal death, cesarean deliveries, maternal care satisfaction, and coast effectiveness programs. A systematic review was used to collect data from studies of mostly non-Caucasian women from low-income population ranging from 12 to 46 years of age and being between 20 to 32 weeks' gestation. Interventional programs were implemented into three categories: group prenatal care, augmented prenatal care, or a combination of both group and augmented prenatal care (Darling et al. 2021). The researchers found that certain interventions, such as prenatal care and augmented care, or a combination of both, may decrease adverse outcomes in small-for-gestational-age and preterm birth, and could aid in increasing maternal care satisfaction. Interventions that worked on enhancing coordination of care were found to result in providing more effective cost savings. The researchers also found disparities in the quality of access to care in the vulnerable population. There was insufficient evidence of suitable quality to confirm that the interventions were successful at enhancing clinical outcomes in prenatal care for at risk populations (Darling et al. 2021).

References

Darling, E. K., Cody, K., Tubman-Broeren, M., & Marquez, O. (2021). The effect of prenatal care delivery models targeting populations with low rates of PNC attendance: A systematic review. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 32(1), 119-136. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/effect-prenatal-care-delivery-models-targeting/docview/2507722229/se-2

· Please refer to the grading rubric in each assignment for more details on how to obtain the optimal grade.

1.

Top of Form

Your assignment is to write an Ethics Paper on the following topic:

Should a corporate organization terminate a worker with social media details/images that could hurt the organization's image?

 I want you to personally reflect on this issue objectively and critically. I expect you to take an enlightened stance on this issue and defend your point-of-view through your research. Be reminded,  there is no right or wrong perspective  here, only your own, therefore, this paper should be an  original representation  of your scholarly ability. 

Please reference examples where appropriate. I am looking forward to reading your papers. 

Please be sure to include concepts that we discussed in class over the last few weeks within your paper.

This assignment is to be submitted by  11:00 AM, 10/20/2024 during week 6. 

Please avoid submitting late work as you will incur a reduction in points.

The report must be written in APA format. Sources are:

1. American Psychological Association. (2010).  Concise Rules of APA Style. 7th ed. Washington, DC: Author. ISBN: 9781433805608

2. https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

. Report must include a proper title page

. Report must include an Abstract page

. Four FULL pages  maximum of content

. In-text citations 

. At  least  FIVE scholarly references dated no earlier than 2019.

. One properly written reference page

. Report must be written in Times New Roman, 12 font, and double-spaced throughout.

Bottom of Form