Post a brief description of each article you found, along with their citations and URLs. Then, address the following:

• Use the Peer-Reviewed Article Checklist document to help you ascertain if the articles are peer reviewed or not. Compare and contrast the two articles, and then further explain, using critical thinking, the differences you noticed between them.
• Explain how the use of peer-review articles can improve the arguments you make in your scholarly writing.
• As a forensic psychology professional, which article would you use as evidence to support your ideas? Why?

Although there is no specific word count required for Discussion posts, a good initial post can typically be expressed in 200–300 words. Regardless of length, posts should be reflective, substantive, and evidence based.

Read your colleagues’ postings.