Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts who chose key articles different than you did. For each, explain how your understanding of risk and/or threat assessment in subject-based profiling has changed based on the information they shared.

Note: Your responses to colleagues should be substantial (250 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable as part of a meaningful response but cannot stand alone as a response. Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning experience for all students.