16 Jun Research topic is Recommendations for Solving Low Rates of College Readiness at James Monroe High School, West Virginia and the theoretical framwork exampl
Research topic is Recommendations for Solving Low Rates of College Readiness at James Monroe High School, West Virginia and the theoretical framwork example is just to show how the assignment should look but dont use anything in the example and make sure to follow the advanced side of the grading rubic
EDUC 850
Theoretical Framework Assignment Instructions
Overview
Research is typically explained, or supported, by a theoretical framework. The question to ask when writing the theoretical framework is “how does the theory inform the problem?” The information in the theoretical framework must present the theory and theorist, coordinating concepts, and rationale for utilizing the theory for the research with a clear connection drawn between the theory and the proposed research.
Instructions
For this assignment, you will use the information from the textbook reading to write a 1-2-page theoretical framework for your research. Choose one theory to explain your research.
· The first page should be a correctly APA formatted title page that includes the title of your study written as required in the textbook and the applied research report. Do not title this assignment “Theoretical Framework Assignment.”
· The second and third pages should be a well-written theoretical framework for your research. This paper must have level one and two headings. Include at least five peer-reviewed scholarly articles using citations. You may not go over the two-page limit, and you must meet the 1-2-page limit (within ¼ of a page either direction). Your voice, as the researcher, must be evident in the explanation of how this theory is appropriate for your research. This must be submitted as one Word document.
· The last page must be the Reference page.
You must use the information from the textbook reading this week to be successful on this assignment.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
,
1
IMPROVING STUDENT TEST SCORES
Recommendations for Solving the Problem of Low Test Scores on the Ohio Educational Assessment for Science at Hampton High School
Liberty Student
School of Education, Liberty University
In partial fulfillment of EDUC 850
Author Note
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Student Name, 1971 University Boulevard, Lynchburg, VA 24515. Email: [email protected]
Theoretical Framework
The main purpose of the theoretical framework is to guide the research and allow the researcher to focus on a specific goal (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). In addition, a solid theoretical framework is used to identify the problem related to the research topic, guide the development of the research questions, and determine the best type of research method for answering those questions. The theory used to explain this research was the measurement of intelligence theory by Binet and Simon (1916).
The measurement of intelligence theory by Binet and Simon (1916) provides a framework and foundation for modern standardized tests. The theory posits that intelligence cannot be measured through a singular tool; rather, the broad nature of one’s intelligence can only be fairly measured when compared to others of similar backgrounds. In France, Binet was tasked with identifying students that needed additional assistance in their educational journey as compulsory attendance became mandatory (Cherry, 2019). This led to the creation of the Binet-Simon scale, which later became known as the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale when it was standardized by Stanford University psychologist, Lewis Terman (United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1992). Because many modern standardized tests are based on Binet and Simon’s measure of intelligence theory and, likewise, the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, this theory is an appropriate choice for this study which seeks to improve standardized assessment scores.
According to Bertolini et al. (2012), several factors impact students’ performance on standardized tests. There are also several strategies that may be implemented at various levels within the structure of a school to help improve students’ performance on standardized tests (Education World, 2019; Garcia & Thornton, 2014; National Association of Elementary School Principals, 2011). This research sought to identify themes related to the problem of students’ low-test scores on the OEA for Science, which is a standardized test; thus, Binet and Simon’s (1916) Measurement of Intelligence Theory is a logical choice for this research.
References
Bertolini, K., Stremmel, A., & Thorngren, J. (2012). Student achievement factors (ED569687). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED568687.pdf
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children: The Binet-Simon scale. Williams & Wilkins, Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/11069-000
Cherry, K. (2019). Alfred Binet and the history of IQ testing. Very Well Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/history-of-intelligence-testing-2795581
Education World. (2019). Boosting test scores: Principal strategies that work. https://www.educationworld.com/a_admin/admin/admin366.shtml
Garcia, L. E., & Thornton, O. (2014, November 18). The enduring importance of parental involvement. NEA Today. http://neatoday.org/2014/11/18/the-enduring-importance-of-parental-involvement-2/
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design an implementation (4th ed.). Wiley Publishing.
National Association of Elementary School Principles. (2011). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making. http://www.naesp.org/sites/default/files/Student_Data_0.pdf
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1992). Testing in American schools: Asking the right questions. U.S. Government Printing Office.
,
Criteria Ratings Points
Scholarly Tone and literature
35 to >32.0 pts
Advanced
Level one and two headings are coherently aligned with the theory and research and are supported throughout the body of the paper using scholarly literature and written in a scholarly tone.
32 to >22.0 pts
Proficient
Level one and two headings are coherently aligned with the theory and research and are mostly supported throughout the body of the paper using scholarly literature and somewhat written in a scholarly tone.
22 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some headings are missing or are not coherently aligned with the theory and research and are not well supported throughout the body of the paper using scholarly literature. Lacks scholarly tone.
0 pts
Not Present
35 pts
Content 70 to >63.0 pts
Advanced
The theory and theorist are included. One theory is well-developed. An explanation for how the theory is appropriate for the research is clearly described. The author’s voice is heard throughout the paper.
63 to >58.0 pts
Proficient
The theory and theorist are included. One theory is mostly well-developed. An explanation for how the theory is appropriate for the research is mostly described. The author’s voice is somewhat heard throughout the paper.
58 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The theory and/or theorist are missing. The theory lacks development. An explanation for how the theory is appropriate for the research is vaguely described or missing. The author’s voice is vaguely heard throughout the paper.
0 pts
Not Present
70 pts
Current APA, Mechanics, Format & Length
45 to >38.0 pts
Advanced
Paper is free of mechanical and current APA errors. 100% of the length requirement is met. All five sources are peer-reviewed and clearly related to the topic. One source may be non-peer reviewed to account for the original theorist.
38 to >36.0 pts
Proficient
Few mechanical and/or current APA errors exist. Length of the paper is met by 90% to 99%. Four sources are peer-reviewed and clearly related to the topic. One source may be non-peer reviewed to account for the original theorist.
36 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Several mechanical and/or current APA errors exist. Length of the paper is met by less than 90%. Fewer than four sources are peer-reviewed. One source may be non-peer reviewed to account for the original theorist. Some sources are not clearly related to the topic.
0 pts
Not Present
45 pts
Total Points: 150
Theoretical Framework Grading Rubric | EDUC850_B12_202230
