Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Analyze the case study How Far Should We Go??.? In your discussion of this case study, include responses to the questions located on page 3 of the case study.? Be sure to cite - EssayAbode

Analyze the case study How Far Should We Go??.? In your discussion of this case study, include responses to the questions located on page 3 of the case study.? Be sure to cite

 Analyze the case study “How Far Should We Go”.  In your discussion of this case study, include responses to the questions located on page 3 of the case study.  Be sure to cite specific evidence from the case to support your positions.  This case study can be found at http://cases.coedu.usf.edu/TCases/how_far_should_we_go.htmLinks to an external site. or can be downloaded by clicking here. 

2020_Writing Rubric_AS/VS/Online (3)

2020_Writing Rubric_AS/VS/Online (3)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Rubric Weight – 45%

16.2 to >14.04 pts

Level 4

Paper provides complete analysis and synthesis of the researched information. Paper covers all key points as outlined in the assignment. If required, CWV addressed completely.

14.04 to >11.88 pts

Level 3

Paper provides analysis and synthesis of the researched information. Paper covers most key points as outlined in the assignment. If required, CWV addressed adequately.

11.88 to >8.64 pts

Level 2

Paper provides only basic information and key points as outlined in the assignment. If required, only basic CWV included.

8.64 to >0 pts

Level 1

Paper does not supply substantive information and key points as outlined in the assignment. Paper also does not present an analysis or synthesis of the researched information. If required, CVW not included.

16.2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

Rubric Weight – 30%

10.8 to >9.0 pts

Level 4

Information and key points are appropriately aligned, and the reader can easily follow the organization of the paper

9 to >7.2 pts

Level 3

Information and key points are mostly aligned so the reader can follow the organization of the paper.

7.2 to >5.4 pts

Level 2

Information and key points are somewhat aligned so the reader can follow the organziation of the paper.

5.4 to >0 pts

Level 1

Paper does not supply substantive information and key points as outlined in the assignment. Paper also does not present an analysis or synthesis of the researched information. If required, CVW not included.

10.8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

Rubric Weight – 15%

5.4 to >4.86 pts

Level 4

The paper demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions and word choice (mechanics, usage, grammar, and syntax).

4.86 to >4.32 pts

Level 3

The paper demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar, and syntax).

4.32 to >4.05 pts

Level 2

The paper demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar, and syntax).

4.05 to >0 pts

Level 1

The paper does not demonstrate consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar, and syntax). Much of the writing is not clear because of the degree of errors.

5.4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting

Rubric Weight – 10%

3.6 to >3.24 pts

Level 4

Nearly error-free APA format

3.24 to >2.88 pts

Level 3

Limited minor APA errors in format

2.88 to >2.7 pts

Level 2

Frequent minor APA errors in format

2.7 to >0 pts

Level 1

Frequent APA errors in format

3.6 pts

Total Points: 36

Related Tags

Academic APA Assignment Business Capstone College Conclusion Course Day Discussion Double Spaced Essay English Finance General Graduate History Information Justify Literature Management Market Masters Math Minimum MLA Nursing Organizational Outline Pages Paper Presentation Questions Questionnaire Reference Response Response School Subject Slides Sources Student Support Times New Roman Title Topics Word Write Writing