08 Mar Review?Distinguishing Sources by Type.Read?the following articles in the?University Library.?Zimmerman, E. L. (2018). What’s under the hood? The mechanics of
Review Distinguishing Sources by Type.
Read the following articles in the University Library.
- Zimmerman, E. L. (2018). What’s under the hood? The mechanics of leadership versus management. Supervision, 79(10), 13–16.
- Porr, D. (2010). Toward more inclusive leadership pedagogy: Expanding the management versus leadership comparison. International Journal of Learning, 17(5), 133–141.
Analyze and evaluate the articles for their credibility as doctoral research sources.
Complete the Source Comparison Matrix.
Note: Remember to proofread your document, including grammar, punctuation, citations, and formatting.
LDR/711A v12
Source Comparison Matrix
LDR/711A v12
Page 2 of 2
Source Comparison Matrix
Complete all three parts of this assignment the matrix, the reflection question response, and the evaluative discussion paper. This is more than a simple worksheet; be thorough and descriptive.
Part 1: Matrix
Complete the table below. The first row has been completed as an example.
Source Evaluation Criteria |
Porr Article |
Zimmerman Article |
Use of APA format for in-text citations and references |
Use of in-text citations |
No APA in-text citations |
Authors’ credentials and affiliation |
||
Source publication (Is the source peer-reviewed according to Ulrich’s?) |
||
Scholarly writing (Comment on author’s use of scholarly writing.) |
||
Use of supporting evidence |
||
Value as a doctoral research source |
Part 2: Reflection
Both articles addressed the same topic—leadership versus management. In at least 100 words, write about the insights you can gain from comparing the two sources’ research value. How will you apply these insights in your doctoral research?
Response:
Part 3: Evaluative Discussion
Provide your response to the prompt using the pre-formatted paper template on the following pages.
Based on the Porr and Zimmerman readings, write a 125-word evaluative discussion about the differences and similarities between management and leadership styles.
Include in-text citations and a reference list.
Title of the Paper
Your Name
Institution Name
Course Name
Instructor’s Name
Assignment Due Date
Title of the Paper
Begin the paper here. Double-space the entire document. Indent the first line by one-tab key (0.5 inches). University of Phoenix accepts one space after a period. The first paragraph is the introduction of every paper and does not contain a subheading. Provide a brief overview of the general topic and end with a preview of the topics discussed in the paper. Unless the paper is a self-assessment analysis or a reflection paper, never write using first-person language: I, me, my, mine, etc. Never write academic papers using second-person language: you, your, yours, etc. Using editorial “we” and “our” is not acceptable. For more information on writing style and grammar, review the APA manual, Chapter 4.
References
Note: References are listed in alphabetical order. All references listed in the reference list must have an in-text citation from that source in the body of the paper. For additional examples of reference formatting, see Chapter 10 of the APA manual.
Journal Article Example
Ainsworth, S., & Purss, A. (2009). Same time, next year? Personnel Review, 38(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480910943304
Authored Book Example
Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2007). Management: Leading and collaborating in a competitive world (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter in an Edited Book Example
Eatough, V., & Smith, J. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 179–195). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607927.n11
Magazine Article Example
Kuttner, R. (2003, September 8). The great American pension-fund robbery. Business Week, 24–26. http://www.businessweek.com/
Dissertation Example
Lisbon, E. I. (2010). A study of leadership preferences by generation. (Publication No. 3455137) [Doctoral dissertation, Our Lady of the Lake University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Webpage on a Website Example
Moore, T. G. (2017, December). Self-compassion may improve resiliency. Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/in-depth/self-compassion
Website Example
World Health Organization (2018, March). Questions and answers on immunization and vaccine safety. https://www.who.int/mongolia/health-topics/vaccines/faq
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
image1.png
,
LDR/711A v12
Distinguishing Sources by Type
LDR/711A v12
Page 2 of 2
Distinguishing Sources by Type
As a doctoral student, you must cite and reference sources in your work. To produce scholarly essays, you must integrate scholarly sources. Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish scholarly from non-scholarly sources. The following chart distinguishes sources by type.
Sources by Type
Scholarly Journals |
Trade Publications |
Popular Press |
Internet |
The primary purpose is to present research, theories, and methodology. |
The primary purpose is to present industry trends, new products, and organizational news. |
The primary purpose is to provide general information or to entertain. |
The primary purpose is to communicate organizational information. |
Geared toward scholars, researchers, and serious graduate students |
Geared toward business or industry members |
Geared toward non-professionals or the general public |
Geared toward non-professionals or the general public |
Scholars and researchers author the articles. |
Journal staff writes the articles. |
Publication staff or freelance writers contribute articles. |
Authors tend to be internal sources or anonymous contributors. |
Articles contain the language of the discipline in a formal, academic tone. |
Articles contain the language of the industry, including technical or professional jargon. |
Articles contain casual, everyday language geared toward a broad-based audience. |
Contains casual, everyday language geared toward a broad-based audience. |
Writers always cite and reference sources. |
Some but not all articles contain citations and references. |
Articles do not contain citations and references. |
Frequently, articles do not contain citations and references. |
Articles generally have a sober, serious appearance, and may contain graphs and charts. |
Articles have a less sober appearance and may contain glossy and exciting pictures. |
Articles have a slick and attractive appearance and contain photographs, drawings, etc. |
Articles have a slick and attractive appearance and contain pop-up ads and graphics. |
Journals contain few or no advertisements. |
May contain advertisements |
Contains advertisements |
Contains advertisements |
Professional organizations or academic press produced |
Professional organizations usually produce |
A company often owns and publishes. |
Often published by organizations or unknown sources |
Editorial board peer reviews article submissions |
Contributions are not peer-reviewed. |
Contributions are not peer-reviewed. |
Rarely peer-reviewed |
Tip: Sometimes it is hard to know if a source is peer-reviewed. Although the Harvard Business Review has the name “Harvard” in the title, it is actually a trade magazine. Ulrich’s Publication Directory provides information on more than 300,000 publications. By consulting Ulrich’s Publication Directory, students can determine a publication’s credibility as a doctoral source. By typing the name of a source in the search field, Ulrich’s will indicate the type of source, such as trade publication, scholarly or academic journal, or consumer magazine.
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
image1.png