10 May Chronic disease such as asthma or heart disease may be the easiest?? In this assignment, you will critique a health or healthcare program based o
Chronic disease such as asthma or heart disease may be the easiest??
In this assignment, you will critique a health or healthcare program based on provided literature. Before beginning this assignment, please visit the module Resources section and review the program critique reading resource.
For this assignment, you will identify the activities used to achieve cultural competence. Then, you will explain whether the given program satisfies the four key ethical principles. Finally, you will describe additional activities that would help ensure the program has met the principles of social justice.
This assignment will help you analyze how your program is expected to address cultural competence and satisfy key ethical and social justice principles. It will also ask you to consider the importance of health literacy when interacting with targeted populations. You will use findings from this assignment to improve your strategy to address cultural competence in your program.
Prompt
Write a program critique that examines a health or healthcare program designed to improve self-management for individuals living with chronic disease. As you develop your critique, assess the program’s design to achieve cultural competence. Determine if each of the four key ethical principles were satisfied and if the principles of social justice were considered.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
- Social Justice Principles: Determine whether the program considered principles of social justice, providing examples to support your claims. Consider the following questions to guide your response:
- Which principles of social justice were met and which weren’t? Justify your rationale.
- What activities would you add to improve this aspect of the program?
- Key Ethical Principles: Explain whether the program satisfied the four key ethical principles required of program designs, providing examples to support your claims. Consider the following questions to guide your response:
- Why is designing and evaluating a program in an ethical manner important?
- What improvements would you suggest for this program to ensure it adheres to ethical principles?
- Cultural Competence: Determine whether the program adequately addressed cultural competence, explaining your rationale. Consider the following questions to guide your response:
- What additional activities would you suggest to address cultural competence in the given program?
- Do you believe the program’s cultural competence activities impacted the outcomes? Why or why not?
- Summary and Recommendations: Summarize your findings from the program analysis and share your recommendations to improve the consideration of cultural competence, social justice, and ethical principles. Consider the following question to guide your response:
- What would you do differently to ensure the given program satisfies key ethical and social justice principles and addresses cultural competency?
Note that all the claims in your deliverable should be evidence based. Your citations should be from your independent search for evidence (not from the scenario, textbook, or module resources) of credible sources and be current within the last five years. You are required to cite a minimum of one source overall. Refer to the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate located in the Start Here section of the course for additional support. If you need writing support, access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.
Guidelines for Submission
Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.
IHP 670 Program Critique Template
Use this template to help you format your program critique assignments in this course. If you choose to use this template, be sure to replace all text in brackets with your responses and remove the bracketed text before submitting this completed template for grading.
Please note that not all the suggested information in this template may be applicable to your assignment, depending on the module in which you submit it. Refer to your specific module’s program critique guidelines and rubric for additional details.
Name: [Insert student name.]
Date: [Insert date.]
APA-formatted reference for article reviewed in this critique: [Insert APA-formatted reference]
Introduction
[Insert a paragraph that includes the article/resource title and the author and summarizes the core idea or goal of the program. Also, provide a 1- to 2-sentence summary of your critique for this program.]
Program Summary
[Insert a summary of the program based on information you gained from reviewing the provided resource. You may include information such as population need, targeted population and location, resources used, activities or interventions implemented, outcome measures and desired results, and authors’ conclusions and recommendations.
Be sure to address rubric-specific criteria from your module’s program critique guidelines and rubric information in this section, as appropriate.]
Critique
[Insert your critique of this program based on information you gained from reviewing the provided resource and other module resources. You may include information such as strengths and weaknesses of the program, whether the program results reflected success, and whether you agreed with the author or program’s conclusions and/or recommendations, as well as why you feel that way.
Be sure to address rubric-specific criteria from your module’s program critique guidelines and rubric information in this section as appropriate.]
Conclusion
[Insert a paragraph that summarizes the major points of the program and your critique. You may include information such as summarizing the key activities and results of the program, stating whether you believe the program should be replicated for other populations and why, and expressing your conclusions with suggestions for how future programs can use this program’s experience.
Be sure to address rubric-specific criteria from your module’s program critique guidelines and rubric information in this section as appropriate.]
,
IHP 670 Program Critique Guide
This guide will help you understand the purpose and step-by-step process of writing a program critique. Use it to help you construct your program critique activities in the course.
The first step to critiquing an article is to understand the difference between the verbs “to criticize” and “to critique.” According to Seager (2018), “criticism is judgmental and focused on finding fault, while critique is descriptive and balanced” (para. 6). The following chart compares these two actions:
|
Critique |
Criticism |
|
Comes from a position of expertise |
Comes from a position of ignorance |
|
Constructive (offers ideas to improve components of the program) |
Destructive (emphasizes what was done wrong) |
|
Selfless (respects the author’s work) |
Selfish (advances personal goals) |
|
Specific |
Vague |
|
Focuses on the creation of the program and its component parts |
Focuses on the creator of the program |
|
Offered to assist the author |
Offered to highlight faults within the work |
The program critique assignments ask that you critique a program described within an identified article. These articles were chosen because they relate to the module’s topics and demonstrate some common problems that programs encounter. Critique the program’s components—its resources, activities, outcome measures, and use of feedback loops. Find areas that could be/need to be improved and offer recommendations. The following outline will help you structure your critique. We have also included a Sample Critique for you to review.
Critique Paper
1. Format your cover page per APA guidelines.
2. Introduce the assigned article with the title, authors, and an appropriate citation. Present the main point of the article. Describe the health or healthcare need or disparity the program tries to address.
3. Briefly summarize the program described within the article. Include a description of the program’s goals and desired outcomes.
4. Identify key resources and activities used.
5. Determine if the desired results were achieved. Did the author(s) report statistical significance?
6. Describe any actions the program takes to adjust and improve.
7. Review the program aspects you believe were well done; review the aspects you believe should be strengthened.
8. Summarize your analysis of the program.
9. Offer recommendations for future programs designed to address similar needs or disparities.
Reference
Seager, T. P. (2018). Critique vs. criticism. https://medium.com/storygarden/critique-vs-criticism-36ddf0d191ff
