Chat with us, powered by LiveChat After watching the video on what it is like to experience the world as a student with a learning disability and reading the Access for All?? MDE document, create a one-page tri - EssayAbode

After watching the video on what it is like to experience the world as a student with a learning disability and reading the Access for All?? MDE document, create a one-page tri

 

After watching the video on what it is like to experience the world as a student with a learning disability and reading the “Access for All” MDE document, create a one-page tri-folded (front & back) pamphlet for regular education classroom teachers that will assist them in understanding the special needs of the students in their classrooms and help them implement effective accommodations/adaptations for these students.  See Appendix B for specific details and scoring rubric.

INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLET RUBRIC

<tr

Related Tags

AcademicAPAAssignmentBusinessCapstoneCollegeConclusionCourseDayDiscussionDouble SpacedEssayEnglishFinanceGeneralGraduateHistoryInformationJustifyLiteratureManagementMarketMastersMathMinimumMLANursingOrganizationalOutlinePagesPaperPresentationQuestionsQuestionnaireReferenceResponseResponseSchoolSubjectSlidesSourcesStudentSupportTimes New RomanTitleTopicsWordWriteWriting

INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLET RUBRIC

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent – Information

20 pts

Advanced

The brochure has all of the required information on 4 learning disabilities (see checklist) and some additional information

17 pts

Proficient

The brochure has all of the required information on 4 learning disabilities (see checklist)

14 pts

Basic

The brochure has most of the required information (see checklist) or all of the information on 3 learning disabilities.

11 pts

Minimal

The brochure has little of the required information or has all of the information on 2 or fewer learning disabilities.

0 pts

No Marks

20 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2 – Learning Differences

The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent – Accuracy

20 pts

Advanced

All facts are accurate and referenced

17 pts

Proficient

90% + of the facts are accurate and referenced. )

14 pts

Basic

80% + of the facts are accurate and referenced.

11 pts

Minimal

Less than 80% of the facts are accurate and referenced.

0 pts

No Marks

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Match to Intended Audience

10 pts

Advanced

Content is excellent match for intended audience.

8.5 pts

Proficient

Content is appropriate match for intended audience

7 pts

Basic

Content is somewhat a match to intended audience.

5.5 pts

Minimal

Content is not well matched to intended audience.

0 pts

No Marks

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Appeal

10 pts

Advanced

Pamphlet has attractive format, well organized, graphics ‘fit’ well.

8.5 pts

Proficient

Pamphlet is well organized but format or graphics don’t ‘fit’ well with topic.

7 pts

Basic

Pamphlet is not well organized but format or graphics ‘fit’ the topic well.

5.5 pts

Minimal

Pamphlet organization and graphics cause confusion.

0 pts

No Marks

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

20 pts

Advanced

There are 3 credible sources for each disability and all are referenced (

17 pts

Proficient

There are 2 credible sources for each disability and all are referenced )

14 pts

Basic

There is only one credible source for each disability and all are referenced

11 pts

Minimal

There are no sources referenced for one or more of the targeted disabilities.

0 pts

No Marks

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA formatting

10 pts

Advanced

The presentation specifically attends to Belhaven APA format. There is a Works Cited/ Reference page with no errors.

8.5 pts

Proficient

Consistently follows Belhaven APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references (NO errors).

7 pts

Basic

Limited (no more than 3) APA errors in Belhaven APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references.

5.5 pts

Minimal

More than 6 APA errors in format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references.

0 pts

No Marks

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

10 pts

Advanced

The presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS.

8.5 pts

Proficient

The presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS.

7 pts

Basic

The presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax).

5.5 pts

Minimal

The presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax).

0 pts

No Marks

10 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2B – Learning Differences

The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2C – Learning Differences

The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.