26 Feb How might we navigate the intricate landscape of participant protection, considering both ethical imperatives and the potential implications of this limited interaction?
When confronted with the utilization of secondary data and the inherent lack of direct engagement with study participants, how might we navigate the intricate landscape of participant protection, considering both ethical imperatives and the potential implications of this limited interaction? What are the advantages and disadvantages of using secondary data? What opportunities for replication can occur with secondary data? How might these opportunities adversely impact participant protection?
Your response must be at least 300 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
